From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from lists.gentoo.org ([140.105.134.102] helo=robin.gentoo.org) by nuthatch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.54) id 1EuH0v-0003n4-6A for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Wed, 04 Jan 2006 22:21:49 +0000 Received: from robin.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.13.5/8.13.5) with SMTP id k04MKp5O032767; Wed, 4 Jan 2006 22:20:51 GMT Received: from smtp.gentoo.org (smtp.gentoo.org [134.68.220.30]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.13.5/8.13.5) with ESMTP id k04MHc7S010978 for ; Wed, 4 Jan 2006 22:17:40 GMT Received: from 83.72.33.139.ip.tele2adsl.dk ([83.72.33.139] helo=osgiliath.brixandersen.dk) by smtp.gentoo.org with esmtpa (Exim 4.54) id 1EuGmH-0007ib-AX for gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org; Wed, 04 Jan 2006 22:06:41 +0000 Received: by osgiliath.brixandersen.dk (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 7CCD633A46; Wed, 4 Jan 2006 23:06:37 +0100 (CET) Date: Wed, 4 Jan 2006 23:06:37 +0100 From: Henrik Brix Andersen To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Monthly Gentoo Council Reminder for January Message-ID: <20060104220637.GA7816@osgiliath.brixandersen.dk> Mail-Followup-To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org References: <200601011053.k01ArjOh019213@robin.gentoo.org> <20060101233526.GB27013@osgiliath.brixandersen.dk> <20060103160503.GP11952@bmb24.uth.tmc.edu> Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="BXVAT5kNtrzKuDFl" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20060103160503.GP11952@bmb24.uth.tmc.edu> X-PGP-Key: http://dev.gentoo.org/~brix/files/HenrikBrixAndersen.asc User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.11 X-Archives-Salt: d2d49015-5fcc-417e-8086-7b0b87d1490b X-Archives-Hash: 97797a62ea6757ec9ee0288698a68e4a --BXVAT5kNtrzKuDFl Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Tue, Jan 03, 2006 at 10:05:03AM -0600, Grant Goodyear wrote: > I doubt that GLEP 45 really needs a vote by the full council. The lead > GLEP editor's decision should probably suffice for something this > trivial. (Recall that the GLEP process is that the GLEP author let's > the GLEP editors know when a GLEP is ready to go up for approval, and > that it is generally the editors who work out precisely who needs to > approve the thing.) I see. > I'll happily approve GLEP 45, with the exception that I don't know how > to implement part of it. The GLEP Last-Modified string is autogenerated > from CVS, so it's not in the yyyy-mm-dd format that the GLEP requires. > Help? Well, CVS doesn't use neither yyyy-mm-dd nor the currently used format, so the conversion must be done in a commit-hook or similar. Perhaps our friendly neighbor Infra knows where this is done? Regards, Brix --=20 Henrik Brix Andersen Gentoo Metadistribution | Mobile computing herd --BXVAT5kNtrzKuDFl Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.2 (GNU/Linux) Comment: GnuPG signed iD8DBQFDvEbsv+Q4flTiePgRAixuAJwLmJNa2Fzdc2y5L0k9pTEEqWmr3QCgnD12 hLwi9RACaOfHsjmiPO4Aa8w= =XTgT -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --BXVAT5kNtrzKuDFl-- -- gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list