From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from lists.gentoo.org ([140.105.134.102] helo=robin.gentoo.org) by nuthatch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.54) id 1EtokQ-0007o0-Ao for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Tue, 03 Jan 2006 16:10:54 +0000 Received: from robin.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.13.5/8.13.5) with SMTP id k03G9MJa032527; Tue, 3 Jan 2006 16:09:22 GMT Received: from smtp.gentoo.org (smtp.gentoo.org [134.68.220.30]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.13.5/8.13.5) with ESMTP id k03G54oE004026 for ; Tue, 3 Jan 2006 16:05:05 GMT Received: from bmb24.med.uth.tmc.edu ([129.106.207.24] helo=localhost) by smtp.gentoo.org with esmtpa (Exim 4.54) id 1Etoem-0004rd-7u for gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org; Tue, 03 Jan 2006 16:05:04 +0000 Date: Tue, 3 Jan 2006 10:05:03 -0600 From: Grant Goodyear To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Monthly Gentoo Council Reminder for January Message-ID: <20060103160503.GP11952@bmb24.uth.tmc.edu> Mail-Followup-To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org References: <200601011053.k01ArjOh019213@robin.gentoo.org> <20060101233526.GB27013@osgiliath.brixandersen.dk> Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="a8sldprk+5E/pDEv" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20060101233526.GB27013@osgiliath.brixandersen.dk> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.11 X-Archives-Salt: fba3dc08-9967-49ed-8348-2016aa0caa5f X-Archives-Hash: 000b1566d31c0368d100e54b82ce7e3f --a8sldprk+5E/pDEv Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Henrik Brix Andersen wrote: [Sun Jan 01 2006, 05:35:26PM CST] > On Sun, Jan 01, 2006 at 05:30:01AM +0000, Mike Frysinger wrote: > > If you have something you'd wish for us to chat about, maybe even > > vote on, let us know ! Simply reply to this e-mail for the whole > > Gentoo dev list to see. >=20 > I would like GLEP 45 [1] - GLEP date format - to be discussed and > voted on. I doubt that GLEP 45 really needs a vote by the full council. The lead GLEP editor's decision should probably suffice for something this trivial. (Recall that the GLEP process is that the GLEP author let's the GLEP editors know when a GLEP is ready to go up for approval, and that it is generally the editors who work out precisely who needs to approve the thing.) I'll happily approve GLEP 45, with the exception that I don't know how to implement part of it. The GLEP Last-Modified string is autogenerated =66rom CVS, so it's not in the yyyy-mm-dd format that the GLEP requires. Help? Thanks, g2boojum --=20 Grant Goodyear=09 Gentoo Developer g2boojum@gentoo.org http://www.gentoo.org/~g2boojum GPG Fingerprint: D706 9802 1663 DEF5 81B0 9573 A6DC 7152 E0F6 5B76 --a8sldprk+5E/pDEv Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.2 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQFDuqCvptxxUuD2W3YRAuPMAJsGQ4z9sI1HYJZchcoX8DawYFrjHACcDSLr vJeAoDqn/MAgX7f6NefcDto= =b2ez -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --a8sldprk+5E/pDEv-- -- gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list