From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Received: from lists.gentoo.org ([140.105.134.102] helo=robin.gentoo.org)
	by nuthatch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.54)
	id 1ErIvP-0000l0-At
	for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Tue, 27 Dec 2005 17:47:51 +0000
Received: from robin.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by robin.gentoo.org (8.13.5/8.13.5) with SMTP id jBRHixiG004558;
	Tue, 27 Dec 2005 17:44:59 GMT
Received: from smtp.gentoo.org (smtp.gentoo.org [134.68.220.30])
	by robin.gentoo.org (8.13.5/8.13.5) with ESMTP id jBRHgdRI008393
	for <gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org>; Tue, 27 Dec 2005 17:42:39 GMT
Received: from c213165.adsl.hansenet.de ([213.39.213.165] helo=iglu.bnet.local)
	by smtp.gentoo.org with esmtpa (Exim 4.54)
	id 1ErIrr-0003sL-JT
	for gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org; Tue, 27 Dec 2005 17:44:11 +0000
From: Carsten Lohrke <carlo@gentoo.org>
To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org
Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Multiple Repo Support
Date: Tue, 27 Dec 2005 18:44:01 +0100
User-Agent: KMail/1.9
References: <43A235AD.6030604@leetworks.com> <200512271405.26499.carlo@gentoo.org> <20051227171049.6a7598d7@snowdrop.home>
In-Reply-To: <20051227171049.6a7598d7@snowdrop.home>
Precedence: bulk
List-Post: <mailto:gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gentoo-dev+help@gentoo.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:gentoo-dev+unsubscribe@gentoo.org>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:gentoo-dev+subscribe@gentoo.org>
List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail <gentoo-dev.gentoo.org>
X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@gentoo.org
Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed;
  boundary="nextPart1820606.PrU6BUXdAH";
  protocol="application/pgp-signature";
  micalg=pgp-sha1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Message-Id: <200512271844.10952.carlo@gentoo.org>
X-Archives-Salt: 607f63cf-40f4-4f9f-bf28-c82170470c16
X-Archives-Hash: 4cfa94c3870405cdb747d692a7ac6aad

--nextPart1820606.PrU6BUXdAH
Content-Type: text/plain;
  charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Content-Disposition: inline

On Tuesday 27 December 2005 18:10, Ciaran McCreesh wrote:
> eclass, and no -r bump.

Then it would not be possible to build the Application against different KD=
E=20
versions and those who want to stay with a previous KDE version wouldn't be=
=20
able to install any application. And conditional dependencies would break=20
caching.


Carsten

--nextPart1820606.PrU6BUXdAH
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.2-ecc0.1.6 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQBDsX1qVwbzmvGLSW8RAlrqAJ9JqB18FcnHH2AV/1Jz7zu1nsOv0QCeJcho
SycxsMiZQh+69IQfLueIX20=
=P0/M
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--nextPart1820606.PrU6BUXdAH--
-- 
gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list