From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from lists.gentoo.org ([140.105.134.102] helo=robin.gentoo.org) by nuthatch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.54) id 1ErHSh-000241-Pz for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Tue, 27 Dec 2005 16:14:08 +0000 Received: from robin.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.13.5/8.13.5) with SMTP id jBRGBkML018962; Tue, 27 Dec 2005 16:11:46 GMT Received: from psmtp01.wxs.nl (psmtp01-real.wxs.nl [195.121.247.14]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.13.5/8.13.5) with ESMTP id jBRG9mG8021899 for ; Tue, 27 Dec 2005 16:09:48 GMT Received: from pavlvs2.devrieze.net (ip5457f303.direct-adsl.nl [84.87.243.3]) by psmtp01.wxs.nl (8.12.10/8.12.10) with ESMTP id jBRGBKkh009276 for ; Tue, 27 Dec 2005 17:11:20 +0100 Received: from hex.local.devrieze.net (hex.local.devrieze.net [192.168.1.7]) by pavlvs2.devrieze.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id A38601004C for ; Tue, 27 Dec 2005 17:11:20 +0100 (CET) From: Paul de Vrieze To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Multiple Repo Support Date: Tue, 27 Dec 2005 17:11:20 +0100 User-Agent: KMail/1.9 References: <43A235AD.6030604@leetworks.com> <200512271643.23071.pauldv@gentoo.org> <200512280106.06586.jstubbs@gentoo.org> In-Reply-To: <200512280106.06586.jstubbs@gentoo.org> X-Face: #Lb+'V@sGJ;ptgo5}V"W+5OCoo{LZv;bh,s,`WKLi/J)ed1_$0;6X<=?utf-8?q?700LVV/=3BLqPhiDP=5E=0A=09=27f=5Dfnv?=@%6M8\'HR1t=aFx;ePfp{ZQoBe+e)JOQ8T5*(_;mHY+cltLGq<;@$Y,=?utf-8?q?O=5C=24=0A=09Tm=23G6M?=,g![Q62J{na*S9d;R[^8pc%u\aiLqU@`kJtYl"^6pxdW Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="nextPart1697497.X42ZFVhjB5"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg=pgp-sha1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: <200512271711.20468.pauldv@gentoo.org> X-Archives-Salt: 3b7e400a-2ac3-4628-a01d-7240520c0a87 X-Archives-Hash: fd1eae9ccdd4c9dc961fe4d4abc13835 --nextPart1697497.X42ZFVhjB5 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline On Tuesday 27 December 2005 17:06, Jason Stubbs wrote: > > > > What about using the "&& ( kde-libs/kde:4 >=3Dkde-libs/kde-4.0.1 )" syn= tax, > > where the && would indicate that the atoms are to be folded, and consid= er > > a single package that should satisfy them instead of the default where = it > > would require two packages. > > Portage's current behaviour is to consider individual atoms individually, > but I wouldn't take that to mean it to be "the default" (as in that all > atoms must be satisfied individually). Optimal behaviour would be to do as > little work as possible to adhere to all requirements, making "&&" (or > "ranged deps") unneccessary. That is true, but my proposal would then still add value in requiring both = to=20 be satisfied by one and the same package. If you have different syntax=20 (perhaps not duplicating the package name) that would be good /better for m= e. Paul =2D-=20 Paul de Vrieze Gentoo Developer Mail: pauldv@gentoo.org Homepage: http://www.devrieze.net --nextPart1697497.X42ZFVhjB5 Content-Type: application/pgp-signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.2-ecc0.1.6 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQBDsWeobKx5DBjWFdsRAl+yAKCKYpQTLOs23EPYiT1CD9qp6XIpWQCgzWu+ 2Nnq5ILxDsULG0bgJqv2i6Q= =tEwb -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --nextPart1697497.X42ZFVhjB5-- -- gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list