From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from lists.gentoo.org ([140.105.134.102] helo=robin.gentoo.org) by nuthatch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.54) id 1ErIYq-0002QU-0u for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Tue, 27 Dec 2005 17:24:32 +0000 Received: from robin.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.13.5/8.13.5) with SMTP id jBRHAC9i030775; Tue, 27 Dec 2005 17:10:12 GMT Received: from smtp.gentoo.org (smtp.gentoo.org [134.68.220.30]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.13.5/8.13.5) with ESMTP id jBRH7mIQ018892 for ; Tue, 27 Dec 2005 17:07:48 GMT Received: from 82-41-57-20.cable.ubr08.edin.blueyonder.co.uk ([82.41.57.20] helo=snowdrop.home) by smtp.gentoo.org with esmtpa (Exim 4.54) id 1ErIK8-0000QU-Nd for gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org; Tue, 27 Dec 2005 17:09:20 +0000 Received: from localhost.home ([127.0.0.1] helo=snowdrop.home) by snowdrop.home with esmtp (Exim 4.54) id 1ErIK7-0005Js-2m for gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org; Tue, 27 Dec 2005 17:09:19 +0000 Date: Tue, 27 Dec 2005 17:09:16 +0000 From: Ciaran McCreesh To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Multiple Repo Support Message-ID: <20051227170916.361a574e@snowdrop.home> In-Reply-To: <200512271648.55694.pauldv@gentoo.org> References: <43A235AD.6030604@leetworks.com> <200512262109.39704.carlo@gentoo.org> <20051226202833.4c5fe9f9@snowdrop.home> <200512271648.55694.pauldv@gentoo.org> X-Mailer: Sylpheed-Claws 2.0.0-rc1 (GTK+ 2.8.9; i686-pc-linux-gnu) Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary=Sig_pWfNcBHRTbNmYkd68C2_k_2; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg=PGP-SHA1 X-Archives-Salt: 3a2f9ea2-4b1d-406e-a909-a2614cab3dca X-Archives-Hash: 6dabbacedfd1d11038d50f9c1743ca4c --Sig_pWfNcBHRTbNmYkd68C2_k_2 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Tue, 27 Dec 2005 16:48:55 +0100 Paul de Vrieze wrote: | Well, it shouldn't be unsolvable. Choosing can be done with the | following process: Your algorithm doesn't work for cases which can be solved by up / down cycling of a version. It also doesn't work for cases where we need the dep tree today rather than some time next year. --=20 Ciaran McCreesh : Gentoo Developer (I can kill you with my brain) Mail : ciaranm at gentoo.org Web : http://dev.gentoo.org/~ciaranm --Sig_pWfNcBHRTbNmYkd68C2_k_2 Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc Content-Disposition: attachment; filename=signature.asc -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.2 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQFDsXU+96zL6DUtXhERAn7wAKDVQAPltCu0j4L2TTgcPQxkWtAjGQCfXKEP wsyo29vyBsjlYgeeicdxIIM= =YFrF -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --Sig_pWfNcBHRTbNmYkd68C2_k_2-- -- gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list