From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from lists.gentoo.org ([140.105.134.102] helo=robin.gentoo.org) by nuthatch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.54) id 1ErFog-0004BL-Ho for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Tue, 27 Dec 2005 14:28:42 +0000 Received: from robin.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.13.5/8.13.5) with SMTP id jBREQK4t012915; Tue, 27 Dec 2005 14:26:20 GMT Received: from smtp.gentoo.org (smtp.gentoo.org [134.68.220.30]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.13.5/8.13.5) with ESMTP id jBREOKcx013178 for ; Tue, 27 Dec 2005 14:24:21 GMT Received: from c213165.adsl.hansenet.de ([213.39.213.165] helo=iglu.bnet.local) by smtp.gentoo.org with esmtpa (Exim 4.54) id 1ErFlv-0005v0-Qs for gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org; Tue, 27 Dec 2005 14:25:52 +0000 From: Carsten Lohrke To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Multiple Repo Support Date: Tue, 27 Dec 2005 15:25:44 +0100 User-Agent: KMail/1.9 References: <43A235AD.6030604@leetworks.com> <200512271445.05776.carlo@gentoo.org> <200512272259.12848.jstubbs@gentoo.org> In-Reply-To: <200512272259.12848.jstubbs@gentoo.org> Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="nextPart13686532.QWXRyJnneU"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg=pgp-sha1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: <200512271525.50300.carlo@gentoo.org> X-Archives-Salt: c6ec9ebd-2000-4b6f-9c56-9340c7fcac2e X-Archives-Hash: 008fcb0e2419cbd22977d17816870ba0 --nextPart13686532.QWXRyJnneU Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline On Tuesday 27 December 2005 14:59, Jason Stubbs wrote: > Do you mind reading and replying to the second paragraph (which happens to > be the only new information I brought to this thread). Underlining words = to > emphasize a point to me that I've opened by agreeing is really not > necessary. I did not want to hurt your feelings by underlining, Jason. :) You missed a= =20 point in your wording of the digikam example in your first paragraph (while= =20 implied in the second), though. It's not only that libkexif and libkipi nee= d=20 to be rebuilt, but any other application (e.g. showimg) depending on them a= s=20 well.=20 > You've misunderstand what is meant by "locking ebuild dependencies". I ga= ve > you a definition in my second paragraph. Please have a re-read. I did not comment on what you wrote, but on Ciaranm's and Brian's ideas abo= ut=20 using slot dependencies regarding KDE packages. Carsten --nextPart13686532.QWXRyJnneU Content-Type: application/pgp-signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.2-ecc0.1.6 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQBDsU7uVwbzmvGLSW8RAiosAKCW++k6D4pdtn6rKsdqtI1TLxkuJwCghzIv 1P0pRIDjqkBn5X40/9RW6is= =vWeK -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --nextPart13686532.QWXRyJnneU-- -- gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list