From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from lists.gentoo.org ([140.105.134.102] helo=robin.gentoo.org) by nuthatch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.54) id 1ErL3M-00048k-4x for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Tue, 27 Dec 2005 20:04:12 +0000 Received: from robin.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.13.5/8.13.5) with SMTP id jBRK1BtJ003001; Tue, 27 Dec 2005 20:01:11 GMT Received: from smtp.gentoo.org (smtp.gentoo.org [134.68.220.30]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.13.5/8.13.5) with ESMTP id jBRJwWNO028103 for ; Tue, 27 Dec 2005 19:58:32 GMT Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=home.wh0rd.org) by smtp.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.54) id 1ErKzN-0005gO-Dc for gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org; Tue, 27 Dec 2005 20:00:05 +0000 Received: (qmail 15525 invoked from network); 27 Dec 2005 14:59:31 -0500 Received: from unknown (HELO vapier) (192.168.0.2) by 192.168.0.1 with SMTP; 27 Dec 2005 14:59:31 -0500 From: Mike Frysinger Organization: wh0rd.org To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Putting qa warnings to a text file instead of showing them to the world Date: Tue, 27 Dec 2005 14:58:58 -0500 User-Agent: KMail/1.9 References: <43AF2BF5.4060905@gentoo.org> <43B198D9.3000900@gentoo.org> In-Reply-To: <43B198D9.3000900@gentoo.org> Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200512271458.58351.vapier@gentoo.org> X-MIME-Autoconverted: from quoted-printable to 8bit by robin.gentoo.org id jBRJwWNO028103 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-MIME-Autoconverted: from 8bit to quoted-printable by robin.gentoo.org id jBRK1Buu003001 X-Archives-Salt: ed2a7f24-9cfb-4526-b107-1cdc0edaa6b7 X-Archives-Hash: d9935be74fabb3d813e479a59bd20591 On Tuesday 27 December 2005 14:41, Petteri R=E4ty wrote: > > On Mon, Dec 26, 2005 at 12:54:04AM +0200, Petteri R=E4ty wrote: > >>Currently there are quite a few ebuilds in the tree that execute dodo= c > >>or dohtml for files that do not exist. I think it would be nice to ha= ve > >>ebuilds die if this is the case. To not break current ebuilds this wo= uld > >>only happen with FEATURES=3D"stricter". This is what I currently do i= n my > >>bashrc. Obviously when integreted to portage one can use helper > >>functions like hasq which are not available in bashrc. > > Well some people opposed this idea so what do everyone think about > making portage output stuff like this to a qa-warnings (or whatever) > file that developers can use? This would have the added benefit that > users would not normally see this stuff and report stuff so easily but > developers would still have easy access to it. Portage could even outpu= t > a header to this file saying not to file bug reports unless you know > what you are doing? if we start "hiding" the output like that then most people will ignore th= em -mike --=20 gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list