From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from lists.gentoo.org ([140.105.134.102] helo=robin.gentoo.org) by nuthatch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.54) id 1Er4fn-0006sQ-Ks for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Tue, 27 Dec 2005 02:34:48 +0000 Received: from robin.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.13.5/8.13.5) with SMTP id jBR2Y3uQ021743; Tue, 27 Dec 2005 02:34:03 GMT Received: from smtp.gentoo.org (smtp.gentoo.org [134.68.220.30]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.13.5/8.13.5) with ESMTP id jBR2WAed025870 for ; Tue, 27 Dec 2005 02:32:10 GMT Received: from d134058.adsl.hansenet.de ([80.171.134.58] helo=iglu.bnet.local) by smtp.gentoo.org with esmtpa (Exim 4.54) id 1Er4dF-00057G-Rc for gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org; Tue, 27 Dec 2005 02:32:10 +0000 From: Carsten Lohrke To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Multiple Repo Support Date: Tue, 27 Dec 2005 03:32:04 +0100 User-Agent: KMail/1.9 References: <43A235AD.6030604@leetworks.com> <200512270301.20576.carlo@gentoo.org> <20051227021124.GH5809@nightcrawler.e-centre.net> In-Reply-To: <20051227021124.GH5809@nightcrawler.e-centre.net> Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="nextPart2389597.YzhCp3RjQV"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg=pgp-sha1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: <200512270332.09857.carlo@gentoo.org> X-Archives-Salt: 9aa6aee2-cc20-45e1-abcb-5658ac5cb9f4 X-Archives-Hash: ef7cad4eb5cf43f2a7a5451e9b0cd7b7 --nextPart2389597.YzhCp3RjQV Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline On Tuesday 27 December 2005 03:11, Brian Harring wrote: > Either way, still not totally following your complaint, thus an actual > example would help (easiest to assume I'm a moron, and start at that > level of explanation). O.k. 1. You have KDE 3.4 and Digikam (version doesn't matter) installed 2. You update to KDE 3.5=20 What you now have is the following: KDE 3.5 works fine and Digikam as well,= =20 just that it uses KDE 3.4 libs. But what happens: A Digikam update (or you= =20 rebuild for whatever reason). You emerge it (against KDE 3.5), but its=20 dependencies (libkipi, libkexif ) are still built against kdelibs 3.4. The= =20 result is that compiling Digikam fails. You need to rebuild these=20 dependencies and every other ebuild depending n those against KDE 3.5. And= =20 Portage should do that transparently. =46or now I have written slot_rebuild() which detects the problem at least = and=20 provides the user with the information what to do, but it's dead ugly. Carsten --nextPart2389597.YzhCp3RjQV Content-Type: application/pgp-signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.2-ecc0.1.6 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQBDsKepVwbzmvGLSW8RAlWNAKChC+8DPiakOt+UV5UG1a/L8Q6E7QCeONW/ +tHedXPFYjh32mfmEEXh9IQ= =leUs -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --nextPart2389597.YzhCp3RjQV-- -- gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list