From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from lists.gentoo.org ([140.105.134.102] helo=robin.gentoo.org) by nuthatch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.54) id 1Er4qZ-0004zQ-Re for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Tue, 27 Dec 2005 02:45:56 +0000 Received: from robin.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.13.5/8.13.5) with SMTP id jBR2jBs0025264; Tue, 27 Dec 2005 02:45:11 GMT Received: from cubert.e-centre.net (morbo.e-centre.net [66.154.82.3]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.13.5/8.13.5) with ESMTP id jBR2hMGJ024075 for ; Tue, 27 Dec 2005 02:43:23 GMT Received: from [10.3.1.19] (helo=barracuda2.stayonline.net) by cubert.e-centre.net with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1Er4o6-0004V5-FC for gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org; Mon, 26 Dec 2005 21:43:22 -0500 X-ASG-Debug-ID: 1135651401-23898-765-0 X-Barracuda-URL: http://10.3.1.19:8000/cgi-bin/mark.cgi Received: from et-pdx-2.site.stayonline.net (unknown [65.200.64.131]) by barracuda2.stayonline.net (Spam Firewall) with ESMTP id F405EA03B1 for ; Mon, 26 Dec 2005 21:43:21 -0500 (EST) Received: from nightcrawler ([172.16.1.202]) by et-pdx-2.site.stayonline.net (8.12.6/8.12.6) with ESMTP id jBR2h95j023933 for ; Tue, 27 Dec 2005 02:43:09 GMT Date: Mon, 26 Dec 2005 18:43:20 -0800 From: Brian Harring To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org X-ASG-Orig-Subj: Re: [gentoo-dev] Multiple Repo Support Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Multiple Repo Support Message-ID: <20051227024320.GK5809@nightcrawler.e-centre.net> References: <43A235AD.6030604@leetworks.com> <200512270301.20576.carlo@gentoo.org> <20051227021124.GH5809@nightcrawler.e-centre.net> <200512270336.10368.carlo@gentoo.org> Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="W/D3X8sky0X3AmG5" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <200512270336.10368.carlo@gentoo.org> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.11 X-Virus-Scanned: by Barracuda Spam Firewall at stayonline.net X-Barracuda-Spam-Score: 0.00 X-Barracuda-Spam-Status: No, SCORE=0.00 using global scores of TAG_LEVEL=1000.0 QUARANTINE_LEVEL=1000.0 KILL_LEVEL=4.0 tests= X-Barracuda-Spam-Report: Code version 3.02, rules version 3.0.6644 Rule breakdown below pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- X-Archives-Salt: a190437c-a7b3-4d03-a02d-06c00f9c4573 X-Archives-Hash: 69ed8a431a20e95f6455e7af90f4cf17 --W/D3X8sky0X3AmG5 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf8 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Tue, Dec 27, 2005 at 03:36:00AM +0100, Carsten Lohrke wrote: > On Tuesday 27 December 2005 03:11, Brian Harring wrote: > > Never said anything about 2.1 + resolver enhancements (no clue where > > that one came from). Merely commenting on your raised issues about > > use/slot deps. >=20 > From your words. Thanks for destroying my hope in two sentences. ;p > So we add this dependency enhancement without having a Portage version in= =20 > place that can resolve issues as they appeare!?! Scary. Who said anything about this going into portage _without_ the resolver=20 enhancements? Re-read my emails, I've stated the resolver improvements are=20 *required* for use/slot to go in (specifically use). So... yeah, you're not following what I've been saying. ~harring --W/D3X8sky0X3AmG5 Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.1 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQFDsKpIvdBxRoA3VU0RAmSwAJ9OpbeWLRHxoqWysGEiPcaLBvMCEACgm+Au lmICcAv89FCUXh4lIBi/pic= =ovfB -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --W/D3X8sky0X3AmG5-- -- gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list