From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from lists.gentoo.org ([140.105.134.102] helo=robin.gentoo.org) by nuthatch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.54) id 1Er3lC-0006bt-4z for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Tue, 27 Dec 2005 01:36:18 +0000 Received: from robin.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.13.5/8.13.5) with SMTP id jBR1Z0Ti014598; Tue, 27 Dec 2005 01:35:00 GMT Received: from smtp.gentoo.org (smtp.gentoo.org [134.68.220.30]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.13.5/8.13.5) with ESMTP id jBR1V76r009597 for ; Tue, 27 Dec 2005 01:31:07 GMT Received: from d134058.adsl.hansenet.de ([80.171.134.58] helo=iglu.bnet.local) by smtp.gentoo.org with esmtpa (Exim 4.54) id 1Er3gB-000603-9c for gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org; Tue, 27 Dec 2005 01:31:07 +0000 From: Carsten Lohrke To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Multiple Repo Support Date: Tue, 27 Dec 2005 02:31:02 +0100 User-Agent: KMail/1.9 References: <43A235AD.6030604@leetworks.com> <200512270133.19909.carlo@gentoo.org> <20051227004649.798c7794@snowdrop.home> In-Reply-To: <20051227004649.798c7794@snowdrop.home> Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="nextPart1339832.fnvqer7oHv"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg=pgp-sha1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: <200512270231.08201.carlo@gentoo.org> X-Archives-Salt: b8aa7f1c-f274-4e37-94e1-7d196704bbcf X-Archives-Hash: c0608095dbe82130c2c990b2351ef7cd --nextPart1339832.fnvqer7oHv Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline On Tuesday 27 December 2005 01:46, Ciaran McCreesh wrote: > You solve this either by SLOTting bar and making each bar SLOT use a > SLOT dep upon KDE, or by using USE flags and [use]:slot deps. It's not a that uncommon case and would lead to dozens, very likely (depend= ing=20 on the future development of KDE and libs around it) hundreds of duplicated= =20 ebuilds. In short: Your approach would result in a unmaintainable mess and = is=20 not going to become reality. > The proposed syntax is cleaner than shoving arbitrary stuff inside > [bleh]. You know the disagree thingie. But it's not that I have to ride on it any=20 longer. Carsten --nextPart1339832.fnvqer7oHv Content-Type: application/pgp-signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.2-ecc0.1.6 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQBDsJlcVwbzmvGLSW8RAp0DAJsFVH9mJafVU4o9XvDiHmZe7RpE4wCfT/2z 8mlUvxwtihJ5R7zNWOnNHh8= =7TAz -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --nextPart1339832.fnvqer7oHv-- -- gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list