From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from lists.gentoo.org ([140.105.134.102] helo=robin.gentoo.org) by nuthatch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.54) id 1EqsRH-0000fI-7k for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Mon, 26 Dec 2005 13:30:59 +0000 Received: from robin.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.13.5/8.13.5) with SMTP id jBQDUFfM011665; Mon, 26 Dec 2005 13:30:15 GMT Received: from smtp.gentoo.org (smtp.gentoo.org [134.68.220.30]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.13.5/8.13.5) with ESMTP id jBQDRDe4020228 for ; Mon, 26 Dec 2005 13:27:14 GMT Received: from zb101200.ppp.dion.ne.jp ([219.125.101.200] helo=opteron246.suzuki-stubbs.home) by smtp.gentoo.org with esmtpa (Exim 4.54) id 1EqsNd-0006xY-D0 for gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org; Mon, 26 Dec 2005 13:27:13 +0000 Received: by opteron246.suzuki-stubbs.home (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 1524A201AC9; Mon, 26 Dec 2005 22:28:13 +0900 (JST) From: Jason Stubbs To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] making dodoc and dohtml die when they fail and stricter is on Date: Mon, 26 Dec 2005 22:28:12 +0900 User-Agent: KMail/1.9 References: <43AF2BF5.4060905@gentoo.org> <200512260913.39975.jstubbs@gentoo.org> <1566320872.20051226120137@gentoo.org> In-Reply-To: <1566320872.20051226120137@gentoo.org> Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200512262228.12764.jstubbs@gentoo.org> X-Archives-Salt: dbb43c5b-74e3-46c9-803b-c20efec2eb94 X-Archives-Hash: c7b0ca51b808915a8c2c7445180f1f5c On Monday 26 December 2005 20:01, Jakub Moc wrote: > >> Currently there are quite a few ebuilds in the tree that execute dodoc > >> or dohtml for files that do not exist. I think it would be nice to have > >> ebuilds die if this is the case. To not break current ebuilds this would > >> only happen with FEATURES="stricter". > > Sigh... There are already bugs flowing in for TEXTRELs/executable stacks > checks implemented in recent portage versions. Some of these bugs are > completely INVALID or CANTFIX - emulation stuff, binary-only ebuilds, etc. > etc. Sigh... None of these issues have made there way to dev-portage. -- Jason Stubbs -- gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list