From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from lists.gentoo.org ([140.105.134.102] helo=robin.gentoo.org) by nuthatch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.54) id 1EqxgB-0006My-Ea for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Mon, 26 Dec 2005 19:06:43 +0000 Received: from robin.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.13.5/8.13.5) with SMTP id jBQJ5x6n001498; Mon, 26 Dec 2005 19:05:59 GMT Received: from smtp.gentoo.org (smtp.gentoo.org [134.68.220.30]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.13.5/8.13.5) with ESMTP id jBQJ3mY3021266 for ; Mon, 26 Dec 2005 19:03:49 GMT Received: from d134058.adsl.hansenet.de ([80.171.134.58] helo=iglu.bnet.local) by smtp.gentoo.org with esmtpa (Exim 4.54) id 1EqxdM-0002dK-Af for gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org; Mon, 26 Dec 2005 19:03:48 +0000 From: Carsten Lohrke To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Stupid USE defaults that need cleaning Date: Mon, 26 Dec 2005 20:03:42 +0100 User-Agent: KMail/1.9 References: <43AF7B25.6060803@gentoo.org> <1962459692.20051226175717@gentoo.org> <20051226170745.67fa5325@snowdrop.home> In-Reply-To: <20051226170745.67fa5325@snowdrop.home> Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="nextPart1548843.fMCru8A77O"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg=pgp-sha1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: <200512262003.48250.carlo@gentoo.org> X-Archives-Salt: 7dc6a1ff-c7fe-4d55-bc3f-e8f27c2f5a55 X-Archives-Hash: b8900a7040dd249b7e82ef64a64a93f9 --nextPart1548843.fMCru8A77O Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline On Monday 26 December 2005 18:07, Ciaran McCreesh wrote: > Because it makes sense. For any application which has IUSE=3D"emboss", > chances are emboss should be enabled. There was a long discussion about > this on the -user list a while back where I ended up posting a > newbie-friendly explanation of the whole thing. Perhaps you could hunt > it down on marc or gmane and post a link here... Probably you should have provided the link, because the question that comes= to=20 mind is, why this dependency is optional at all, when it should be enabled= =20 anyways!? Carsten --nextPart1548843.fMCru8A77O Content-Type: application/pgp-signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.2-ecc0.1.6 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQBDsD6UVwbzmvGLSW8RAlszAJ9Yu/j079EGWoYy3Z01rP5ruxIZEgCfbK90 14AvZNy2psLpUxw7bVaDJLM= =yOx5 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --nextPart1548843.fMCru8A77O-- -- gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list