Re: [gentoo-dev] making dodoc and dohtml die when they fail and stricter is on

["Diego 'Flameeyes' Pettenò" <flameeyes@gentoo.org>]

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1127 bytes --]

On Monday 26 December 2005 03:28, Chris White wrote:
> I'm not sure if we're on the same page as far as the target audience of
> this change.  The target audience is developers/those with strict in their
> features.
Actually "stricter", and there are way too many people to put that in without 
knowing what that do... or is it a default nowadays, I'm not even sure.

> I've always found dodoc should 
> be checked anyways, and if we're assuming the documentation consists of the
> formentioned items, then we're also having the situation of missing other
> important documentation as well.  
Take KDE-related packages.. a good 90% of those have just the files I named or 
a subset of them as documentation, for those, the eclass already take care of 
them definitely.
When there's something _more_, it can be dodoc-ed by hand. But it would fail 
if someone didn't put a NEWS file or a ChangeLog ... that seems stupid to me.

Also, I think jakub is totally right with this.

-- 
Diego "Flameeyes" Pettenò - http://dev.gentoo.org/~flameeyes/
Gentoo/ALT lead, Gentoo/FreeBSD, Video, AMD64, Sound, PAM, KDE

[-- Attachment #2: Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 189 bytes --]