From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Received: from lists.gentoo.org ([140.105.134.102] helo=robin.gentoo.org)
	by nuthatch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.54)
	id 1EqEfO-0007BA-Co
	for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Sat, 24 Dec 2005 19:02:54 +0000
Received: from robin.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by robin.gentoo.org (8.13.5/8.13.5) with SMTP id jBOJ1d0e025557;
	Sat, 24 Dec 2005 19:01:39 GMT
Received: from smtp.gentoo.org (smtp.gentoo.org [134.68.220.30])
	by robin.gentoo.org (8.13.5/8.13.5) with ESMTP id jBOIxXtw024674
	for <gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org>; Sat, 24 Dec 2005 18:59:33 GMT
Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=home.wh0rd.org)
	by smtp.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.54)
	id 1EqEc8-0001DR-Rt
	for gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org; Sat, 24 Dec 2005 18:59:33 +0000
Received: (qmail 16401 invoked from network); 24 Dec 2005 13:59:13 -0500
Received: from unknown (HELO vapier) (192.168.0.2)
  by 192.168.0.1 with SMTP; 24 Dec 2005 13:59:13 -0500
From: Mike Frysinger <vapier@gentoo.org>
Organization: wh0rd.org
To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org
Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] contents of /dev after initial installation
Date: Sat, 24 Dec 2005 13:59:33 -0500
User-Agent: KMail/1.9
Cc: Bjarke Istrup Pedersen <gurligebis@gentoo.org>
References: <1133490923.15611.31.camel@sputnik886.ruz-net> <43AD6CA2.8060307@gentoo.org>
In-Reply-To: <43AD6CA2.8060307@gentoo.org>
Precedence: bulk
List-Post: <mailto:gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gentoo-dev+help@gentoo.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:gentoo-dev+unsubscribe@gentoo.org>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:gentoo-dev+subscribe@gentoo.org>
List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail <gentoo-dev.gentoo.org>
X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@gentoo.org
Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain;
  charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Disposition: inline
Message-Id: <200512241359.33713.vapier@gentoo.org>
X-Archives-Salt: 7976fd4b-d02a-48a6-97a2-86650ac45a16
X-Archives-Hash: 95452a4e273402256426394caf4fd56c

On Saturday 24 December 2005 10:43, Bjarke Istrup Pedersen wrote:
> Is there any reason for not doing this, and then recommend that the
> users that don't use udev/devfs to run MAKEDEV ?

because the process can easily go wrong leaving new users without a clue of 
whats going on
-mike
-- 
gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list