From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from lists.gentoo.org ([140.105.134.102] helo=robin.gentoo.org) by nuthatch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.54) id 1EprUl-000158-Ug for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Fri, 23 Dec 2005 18:18:24 +0000 Received: from robin.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.13.5/8.13.5) with SMTP id jBNIGolG011124; Fri, 23 Dec 2005 18:16:50 GMT Received: from smtp.gentoo.org (smtp.gentoo.org [134.68.220.30]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.13.5/8.13.5) with ESMTP id jBNIBs9C009822 for ; Fri, 23 Dec 2005 18:11:55 GMT Received: from zb101200.ppp.dion.ne.jp ([219.125.101.200] helo=opteron246.suzuki-stubbs.home) by smtp.gentoo.org with esmtpa (Exim 4.54) id 1EprOU-000186-A9 for gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org; Fri, 23 Dec 2005 18:11:54 +0000 Received: by opteron246.suzuki-stubbs.home (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 3C125201AA6; Sat, 24 Dec 2005 03:12:50 +0900 (JST) From: Jason Stubbs To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Multiple Repo Support Date: Sat, 24 Dec 2005 03:12:50 +0900 User-Agent: KMail/1.9 References: <43A235AD.6030604@leetworks.com> <20051216175431.51b59e53@snowdrop.home> <200512231857.51706.pauldv@gentoo.org> In-Reply-To: <200512231857.51706.pauldv@gentoo.org> Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200512240312.50126.jstubbs@gentoo.org> X-Archives-Salt: 43869788-d7ef-4752-80b6-4b75febd2de9 X-Archives-Hash: cfb2c942dc6e791b94dddff2b5b1c208 On Saturday 24 December 2005 02:57, Paul de Vrieze wrote: > On Friday 16 December 2005 18:54, Ciaran McCreesh wrote: > > On Fri, 16 Dec 2005 10:00:02 +0100 Danny van Dyk > > > > wrote: > > | Just one remark: What about making the syntax a bit more familiar to > > | C++ users: > > | > > | ~ DEPENDS="gentoo-foo::foo-bar/baz-2.1" > > > > That was my original thought when I started playing with it. I switched > > to postfix to make it more consistent with the way :slot and [use] > > restrictions work. *shrug* I guess it's down to whether you consider a > > Do those already work then? I'd like to be able to use them. :slot and [use]? Not yet. I'm sure that once they do the shouts will be resounding across the globe such that it would not be possible for you to be unaware of it... ;) -- Jason Stubbs -- gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list