From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from lists.gentoo.org ([140.105.134.102] helo=robin.gentoo.org) by nuthatch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.54) id 1EpuXX-0000Ie-0z for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Fri, 23 Dec 2005 21:33:27 +0000 Received: from robin.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.13.5/8.13.5) with SMTP id jBNLWdim015151; Fri, 23 Dec 2005 21:32:39 GMT Received: from smtp.gentoo.org (smtp.gentoo.org [134.68.220.30]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.13.5/8.13.5) with ESMTP id jBNLUHHw002835 for ; Fri, 23 Dec 2005 21:30:18 GMT Received: from d180017.adsl.hansenet.de ([80.171.180.17] helo=iglu.bnet.local) by smtp.gentoo.org with esmtpa (Exim 4.54) id 1EpuUT-0003cb-Bc for gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org; Fri, 23 Dec 2005 21:30:17 +0000 From: Carsten Lohrke To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Multiple Repo Support Date: Fri, 23 Dec 2005 22:30:09 +0100 User-Agent: KMail/1.9 References: <43A235AD.6030604@leetworks.com> <200512240337.38188.jstubbs@gentoo.org> <1135370733.1873.10.camel@Darkmere.darkmere> In-Reply-To: <1135370733.1873.10.camel@Darkmere.darkmere> Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="nextPart1335696.mOlufUrjfR"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg=pgp-sha1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: <200512232230.15897.carlo@gentoo.org> X-Archives-Salt: 19947d3b-58b5-4ab5-9c15-a6ef0778b2fd X-Archives-Hash: a03e0872435c08ca5be9c1e0ca52f9b7 --nextPart1335696.mOlufUrjfR Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline On Friday 23 December 2005 21:45, Spider (DmD Lj) wrote: > Erm.. No, I don't think he is. We've been asking / waiting for the > [use] syntax to appear since before you joined the project. It's been on > "the list" for so long that many of us have given up... ; ) He - and I thought I just missed the thread between all those emails in my= =20 inbox. I'm interested as well to hear a bit about the proposed enhanced=20 dependency syntax. > (finally we can kill use_with !! ) Why? There're not only autotooled configure scripts, so I don't see how to= =20 replace it in a generic way. I don't see what this would have to do with=20 depending on ( ebuild foo without use flag bar ), either. Carsten --nextPart1335696.mOlufUrjfR Content-Type: application/pgp-signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.2-ecc0.1.6 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQBDrGxnVwbzmvGLSW8RAiAxAKC2U2fKvmpBZK92kMV4dMxilTliqACdHivt RfPb3r7tTCLx8veZf67tSzg= =M2I3 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --nextPart1335696.mOlufUrjfR-- -- gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list