From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from lists.gentoo.org ([140.105.134.102] helo=robin.gentoo.org) by nuthatch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.54) id 1Epucv-0001Tp-EN for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Fri, 23 Dec 2005 21:39:01 +0000 Received: from robin.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.13.5/8.13.5) with SMTP id jBNLcG1X008137; Fri, 23 Dec 2005 21:38:16 GMT Received: from smtp.gentoo.org (smtp.gentoo.org [134.68.220.30]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.13.5/8.13.5) with ESMTP id jBNLaPp9000742 for <gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org>; Fri, 23 Dec 2005 21:36:26 GMT Received: from 82-41-57-20.cable.ubr08.edin.blueyonder.co.uk ([82.41.57.20] helo=snowdrop.home) by smtp.gentoo.org with esmtpa (Exim 4.54) id 1EpuaP-0004nI-Kl for gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org; Fri, 23 Dec 2005 21:36:25 +0000 Received: from localhost.home ([127.0.0.1] helo=snowdrop.home) by snowdrop.home with esmtp (Exim 4.54) id 1EpuaJ-0008Bm-PH for gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org; Fri, 23 Dec 2005 21:36:19 +0000 Date: Fri, 23 Dec 2005 21:36:16 +0000 From: Ciaran McCreesh <ciaranm@gentoo.org> To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Viability of other SCM/version control systems for big repo's Message-ID: <20051223213616.187dc29e@snowdrop.home> In-Reply-To: <200512232033.20356.pauldv@gentoo.org> References: <43A70D98.7070504@gentoo.org> <20051220003120.595b486f@snowdrop.home> <43A77557.7070009@gmail.com> <200512232033.20356.pauldv@gentoo.org> X-Mailer: Sylpheed-Claws 2.0.0-rc1 (GTK+ 2.8.9; i686-pc-linux-gnu) Precedence: bulk List-Post: <mailto:gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org> List-Help: <mailto:gentoo-dev+help@gentoo.org> List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:gentoo-dev+unsubscribe@gentoo.org> List-Subscribe: <mailto:gentoo-dev+subscribe@gentoo.org> List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail <gentoo-dev.gentoo.org> X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="Sig_KabwNgl9_yst=zUpkC7gJK9"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg=PGP-SHA1 X-Archives-Salt: 18398f3a-961d-4ff8-8c1c-2ce67432ca29 X-Archives-Hash: 8d75fc0c77be4c78d8bda6e53f62bca5 --Sig_KabwNgl9_yst=zUpkC7gJK9 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Fri, 23 Dec 2005 20:33:13 +0100 Paul de Vrieze <pauldv@gentoo.org> wrote: | - Checkout time of a full new tree (no load, and with load) Do we really care about this? SVN will do really really badly here, but does it matter? | - Concurrency performance (how do multiple simultaneous commits and | updates perform) With this one, you've got to bear in mind that SVN will correctly handle transaction commits, whereas CVS will quite happily let you crap all over half of someone else's transaction. Performance comparisons are only one part of it... --=20 Ciaran McCreesh : Gentoo Developer (I can kill you with my brain) Mail : ciaranm at gentoo.org Web : http://dev.gentoo.org/~ciaranm --Sig_KabwNgl9_yst=zUpkC7gJK9 Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc Content-Disposition: attachment; filename=signature.asc -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.2 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQFDrG3T96zL6DUtXhERAkPTAKCJ2onBGUFGnFtyceTiA9vd7zUfZwCeP7Aq F0Wy8yGzPFYnGBGQdwqgMVE= =69fL -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --Sig_KabwNgl9_yst=zUpkC7gJK9-- -- gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list