From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from lists.gentoo.org ([140.105.134.102] helo=robin.gentoo.org) by nuthatch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.54) id 1EpsiI-0004q0-Kb for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Fri, 23 Dec 2005 19:36:27 +0000 Received: from robin.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.13.5/8.13.5) with SMTP id jBNJZIHq019954; Fri, 23 Dec 2005 19:35:18 GMT Received: from psmtp01.wxs.nl (psmtp01-real.wxs.nl [195.121.247.14]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.13.5/8.13.5) with ESMTP id jBNJXLrI005643 for ; Fri, 23 Dec 2005 19:33:22 GMT Received: from pavlvs2.devrieze.net (ip5457f303.direct-adsl.nl [84.87.243.3]) by psmtp01.wxs.nl (8.12.10/8.12.10) with ESMTP id jBNJXKkh009171 for ; Fri, 23 Dec 2005 20:33:21 +0100 Received: from hex.local.devrieze.net (hex.local.devrieze.net [192.168.1.7]) by pavlvs2.devrieze.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id C19D41004C for ; Fri, 23 Dec 2005 20:33:20 +0100 (CET) From: Paul de Vrieze To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Viability of other SCM/version control systems for big repo's Date: Fri, 23 Dec 2005 20:33:13 +0100 User-Agent: KMail/1.8.92 References: <43A70D98.7070504@gentoo.org> <20051220003120.595b486f@snowdrop.home> <43A77557.7070009@gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <43A77557.7070009@gmail.com> X-Face: #Lb+'V@sGJ;ptgo5}V"W+5OCoo{LZv;bh,s,`WKLi/J)ed1_$0;6X<=?utf-8?q?700LVV/=3BLqPhiDP=5E=0A=09=27f=5Dfnv?=@%6M8\'HR1t=aFx;ePfp{ZQoBe+e)JOQ8T5*(_;mHY+cltLGq<;@$Y,=?utf-8?q?O=5C=24=0A=09Tm=23G6M?=,g![Q62J{na*S9d;R[^8pc%u\aiLqU@`kJtYl"^6pxdW Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="nextPart1719210.DbqgZNpxzY"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg=pgp-sha1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: <200512232033.20356.pauldv@gentoo.org> X-Archives-Salt: 0d7c7713-dc32-4dd4-b9f9-bfb43683ef9d X-Archives-Hash: 9b7d37f400f367f771882c90c4d94b77 --nextPart1719210.DbqgZNpxzY Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline On Tuesday 20 December 2005 04:07, Chandler Carruth wrote: > Ciaran McCreesh wrote: > >On Tue, 20 Dec 2005 09:17:56 +0900 Kalin KOZHUHAROV > > > > wrote: > > | As far as speed is concerned, it is comparable with CVS. > > > >Be more specific please. We're looking for benchmarks showing how well > >it performs in terms of speed, bandwidth and memory usage for actions > >such as commit and update on a repository with 100k+ small files. > > I have hardware on which I would be more than willing to perform this > type of benchmark. Can you provide/point to a repository of files to > benchmark, and a set of operations to perform? The obvious being the > portage tree itself, with some/all of its history (however much is > necessary for the benchmarks to be meaningful), but would require a set > of activities to generate a relevant benchmark. > > For reference, I have a server that is not yet in production, but > readying for production in the next few months, running Gentoo, on a > raid-5 array of SCSI harddrives. I don't remember the precise > specifications off hand, but I could provide them along with the results. > > Would this be useful? Would more/other hardware be necessary useful? (I > have access to multiple workstations on which I could run simultaneous > tests, causing transactions to become relevant and important, etc etc, > and further hardware might be available here.) Hope this can be of some > use to you in trying to make this evaluation. In this respect we want to know things like: =2D Checkout time of a full new tree (no load, and with load) =2D Update time (without load, and with load) =2D Concurrency performance (how do multiple simultaneous commits and updat= es perform) =2D Is there a difference between checking out and committing parts of the = tree instead of the full tree. Paul =2D-=20 Paul de Vrieze Gentoo Developer Mail: pauldv@gentoo.org Homepage: http://www.devrieze.net --nextPart1719210.DbqgZNpxzY Content-Type: application/pgp-signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.2-ecc0.1.6 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQBDrFEAbKx5DBjWFdsRAvccAJ9qxN4DK3isPZaE7iVANsk4HmAD9QCg2mL2 dbH8pMKMHKU5Kodkgblb6Ms= =ZVPT -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --nextPart1719210.DbqgZNpxzY-- -- gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list