From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from lists.gentoo.org ([140.105.134.102] helo=robin.gentoo.org) by nuthatch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.54) id 1EprVA-0002JP-GR for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Fri, 23 Dec 2005 18:18:48 +0000 Received: from robin.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.13.5/8.13.5) with SMTP id jBNIHGns030434; Fri, 23 Dec 2005 18:17:16 GMT Received: from smtp.gentoo.org (smtp.gentoo.org [134.68.220.30]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.13.5/8.13.5) with ESMTP id jBNICH86005045 for ; Fri, 23 Dec 2005 18:12:17 GMT Received: from 82-41-57-20.cable.ubr08.edin.blueyonder.co.uk ([82.41.57.20] helo=snowdrop.home) by smtp.gentoo.org with esmtpa (Exim 4.54) id 1EprOr-0000XI-11 for gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org; Fri, 23 Dec 2005 18:12:17 +0000 Received: from localhost.home ([127.0.0.1] helo=snowdrop.home) by snowdrop.home with esmtp (Exim 4.54) id 1EprOl-0006KX-1b for gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org; Fri, 23 Dec 2005 18:12:11 +0000 Date: Fri, 23 Dec 2005 18:12:07 +0000 From: Ciaran McCreesh To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Multiple Repo Support Message-ID: <20051223181207.4c3d4703@snowdrop.home> In-Reply-To: <200512231857.51706.pauldv@gentoo.org> References: <43A235AD.6030604@leetworks.com> <43A28212.8040302@gentoo.org> <20051216175431.51b59e53@snowdrop.home> <200512231857.51706.pauldv@gentoo.org> X-Mailer: Sylpheed-Claws 2.0.0-rc1 (GTK+ 2.8.9; i686-pc-linux-gnu) Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="Sig_kNQmyxWMNW2uHcQjLJ8/IBJ"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg=PGP-SHA1 X-Archives-Salt: 462cd39e-2013-4bb1-b9c6-a4d070496264 X-Archives-Hash: 3be0180a1823c845649519dbca30cc7b --Sig_kNQmyxWMNW2uHcQjLJ8/IBJ Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Fri, 23 Dec 2005 18:57:44 +0100 Paul de Vrieze wrote: | > That was my original thought when I started playing with it. I | > switched to postfix to make it more consistent with the way :slot | > and [use] restrictions work. *shrug* I guess it's down to whether | > you consider a |=20 | Do those already work then? I'd like to be able to use them. Not in anything end users should be using. The syntax is pretty much decided upon though... --=20 Ciaran McCreesh : Gentoo Developer (I can kill you with my brain) Mail : ciaranm at gentoo.org Web : http://dev.gentoo.org/~ciaranm --Sig_kNQmyxWMNW2uHcQjLJ8/IBJ Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc Content-Disposition: attachment; filename=signature.asc -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.2 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQFDrD3696zL6DUtXhERAhvwAJ9X1LQ42CGSBBwPwypKP378/5FxgQCeN9Av vioU8kzQIkNvskatf04X6tg= =M7df -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --Sig_kNQmyxWMNW2uHcQjLJ8/IBJ-- -- gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list