From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from lists.gentoo.org ([140.105.134.102] helo=robin.gentoo.org) by nuthatch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.54) id 1EpVvg-0007m8-VS for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Thu, 22 Dec 2005 19:16:45 +0000 Received: from robin.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.13.5/8.13.5) with SMTP id jBMJG1Dm020412; Thu, 22 Dec 2005 19:16:01 GMT Received: from smtp.gentoo.org (smtp.gentoo.org [134.68.220.30]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.13.5/8.13.5) with ESMTP id jBMJEAN5012419 for ; Thu, 22 Dec 2005 19:14:11 GMT Received: from c-24-10-122-88.hsd1.ca.comcast.net ([24.10.122.88] helo=phaenix.haell.com) by smtp.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.54) id 1EpVtC-0007cq-RA for gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org; Thu, 22 Dec 2005 19:14:10 +0000 Received: by phaenix.haell.com (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 26C3B1E22462; Thu, 22 Dec 2005 11:14:10 -0800 (PST) Date: Thu, 22 Dec 2005 11:14:09 -0800 From: Drake Wyrm To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] another global use flag... Message-ID: <20051222191409.GA24172@phaenix.haell.com> Mail-Followup-To: gentoo-dev@gentoo.org References: <200512221710.52982.carlo@gentoo.org> Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="VbJkn9YxBvnuCH5J" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <200512221710.52982.carlo@gentoo.org> X-Arch: athlon_tbird-gentoo-linux-gnu X-Fnord: There is no conspiracy X-Fortune: Condense soup, not books! User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.11 X-Archives-Salt: 7cda3e3d-e994-4115-99e4-f25fa036f605 X-Archives-Hash: d4ad55828f6012653a269e778883378e --VbJkn9YxBvnuCH5J Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Carsten Lohrke wrote: > use.local.desc:app-text/ghostscript-afpl:jasper - Enable support for > jpeg2k (jasper) > use.local.desc:kde-base/kdegraphics:jpeg2k - Enable support for jpeg2k > (jasper) > use.local.desc:kde-base/kdelibs:jpeg2k - Enable support for jpeg2k > (jasper) > use.local.desc:net-proxy/ziproxy:jpeg2k - Enable support for jpeg2k > (jasper) > use.local.desc:sci-libs/gdal:jasper - Adds support for JPEG 2000 >=20 >=20 > I was just about adding another one and thought it would be better to mer= ge=20 > them to a global jpeg2k use flag. Complains? Query: Which would be more appropriate in this case? "jasper" for the library it pulls in as a depend, or "jpeg2k" for the functionality that library provides? There's nothing else in the tree (as far as I can tell) which provides JPEG-2000, but there could be. --=20 I used to think romantic love was a neurosis shared by two, a supreme foolishness. I no longer thought that. There's nothing foolish in loving anyone. Thinking you'll be loved in return is what's foolish. -- Rita Mae Brown --VbJkn9YxBvnuCH5J Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.2 (GNU/Linux) iEYEARECAAYFAkOq+wEACgkQQWVmeKdhp/IB4QCfUeu4kTPJJq/GBftfDwUKa6hO U54Anjl8LBBEgoKma7a4ilAhdNcWAmNR =Qw/X -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --VbJkn9YxBvnuCH5J-- -- gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list