[gentoo-dev] tcltk splitting [again]

[gentoo-dev] tcltk splitting [again]

[Mike Frysinger]

came someone please remind me why we havent split the tcltk USE flag
into tcl and tk ?  wanting tcl support on a server makes sense, and
doing something like 'tcltk? ( X? ( tk ) )' is just dumb
-mike
-- 
gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list

Re: [gentoo-dev] tcltk splitting [again]

[George Shapovalov]

Um, I cannot remind why we did not split, because I remember (unless I am 
hallucinating of course. That was like 2 years ago, or more..) that we 
actually had them split and then they were joined.. For whatever it is 
worth..
As for reasons, not really sure, did not check at the time (as I did not deal 
much with them). I guess in that general sweep of "trying to make use flags 
manageable"..

George

On Wednesday, 21. December 2005 21:47, Mike Frysinger wrote:
> came someone please remind me why we havent split the tcltk USE flag
> into tcl and tk ?  wanting tcl support on a server makes sense, and
> doing something like 'tcltk? ( X? ( tk ) )' is just dumb
> -mike
-- 
gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list

Re: [gentoo-dev] tcltk splitting [again]

[Mike Frysinger]

On Wed, Dec 21, 2005 at 11:24:10PM +0100, George Shapovalov wrote:
> Um, I cannot remind why we did not split, because I remember (unless I am 
> hallucinating of course. That was like 2 years ago, or more..) that we 
> actually had them split and then they were joined.. For whatever it is 
> worth..

i cant say i ever remember them being sep ... afaik, they've always
been one USE flag ... but viewcvs says that we had a "tcl" and a 
"tcltk" rather than a "tcl" and "tk" flag ...
-mike
-- 
gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list