From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from lists.gentoo.org ([140.105.134.102] helo=robin.gentoo.org) by nuthatch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.54) id 1Ep3qu-0006iD-L1 for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Wed, 21 Dec 2005 13:17:57 +0000 Received: from robin.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.13.5/8.13.5) with SMTP id jBLDGgVV017049; Wed, 21 Dec 2005 13:16:42 GMT Received: from mail.marples.name (rsm.demon.co.uk [80.177.111.50]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.13.5/8.13.5) with ESMTP id jBLDDTlF021362 for ; Wed, 21 Dec 2005 13:13:29 GMT Received: from uberlaptop.development.ltl (logos [195.2.133.104]) by mail.marples.name (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3E109907A0B5 for ; Wed, 21 Dec 2005 13:13:29 +0000 (GMT) From: Roy Marples To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] baselayout-1.11.14 stabilization Date: Wed, 21 Dec 2005 13:13:31 +0000 User-Agent: KMail/1.9 References: <20051220143602.GC18141@toucan.gentoo.org> <1135169377.11036.2.camel@vertigo.twi-31o2.org> In-Reply-To: <1135169377.11036.2.camel@vertigo.twi-31o2.org> Organization: Gentoo Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200512211313.31809.uberlord@gentoo.org> X-Archives-Salt: 8ee44106-f89d-4b59-93ac-3f81594d7153 X-Archives-Hash: 581368e96c0629c9f0585ac9fa1e5412 On Wednesday 21 December 2005 12:49, Chris Gianelloni wrote: > On Tue, 2005-12-20 at 14:36 +0000, Mike Frysinger wrote: > > since we have baselayout-1.12.x in ~arch, the new stable candidate > > (1.11.14) isnt getting much air time ... can people try upgrading to > > it and post any feedback they have with it ? it should mostly be a > > bugfix release over 1.11.13 since we arent doing any more real features > > for the 1.11.x branch ... > > Does this preclude any bug fixes going into 1.11 that affect the > release? I have at least two that I would love to get resolved before > 2006.0's release, and waiting for the eventual stabilization of 1.12 > isn't exactly the best plan for this. Got bug numbers? -- Roy Marples Gentoo Linux Developer -- gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list