From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from lists.gentoo.org ([140.105.134.102] helo=robin.gentoo.org) by nuthatch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.54) id 1EoVS6-00002k-Cr for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Tue, 20 Dec 2005 00:34:02 +0000 Received: from robin.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.13.5/8.13.5) with SMTP id jBK0XIgY032587; Tue, 20 Dec 2005 00:33:18 GMT Received: from smtp.gentoo.org (smtp.gentoo.org [134.68.220.30]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.13.5/8.13.5) with ESMTP id jBK0VQ0A005662 for <gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org>; Tue, 20 Dec 2005 00:31:26 GMT Received: from 82-41-57-20.cable.ubr08.edin.blueyonder.co.uk ([82.41.57.20] helo=snowdrop.home) by smtp.gentoo.org with esmtpa (Exim 4.54) id 1EoVPa-0007KK-5U for gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org; Tue, 20 Dec 2005 00:31:26 +0000 Received: from localhost.home ([127.0.0.1] helo=snowdrop.home) by snowdrop.home with esmtp (Exim 4.54) id 1EoVPX-0006Su-0b for gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org; Tue, 20 Dec 2005 00:31:23 +0000 Date: Tue, 20 Dec 2005 00:31:20 +0000 From: Ciaran McCreesh <ciaranm@gentoo.org> To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Viability of other SCM/version control systems for big repo's Message-ID: <20051220003120.595b486f@snowdrop.home> In-Reply-To: <43A74DB4.7040504@thinrope.net> References: <43A70D98.7070504@gentoo.org> <1135027076.28875.11.camel@localhost> <20051219213810.GA9392@ferdyx.org> <20051219215544.GD18849@butchest.cubesearch.com> <623652d50512191435x2209a2f6p@mail.gmail.com> <43A74DB4.7040504@thinrope.net> X-Mailer: Sylpheed-Claws 2.0.0-rc1 (GTK+ 2.8.9; i686-pc-linux-gnu) Precedence: bulk List-Post: <mailto:gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org> List-Help: <mailto:gentoo-dev+help@gentoo.org> List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:gentoo-dev+unsubscribe@gentoo.org> List-Subscribe: <mailto:gentoo-dev+subscribe@gentoo.org> List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail <gentoo-dev.gentoo.org> X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary=Sig_W+cKtHo3bynaNisKm2r3ycB; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg=PGP-SHA1 X-Archives-Salt: a2b57db4-32ac-4f8d-a46b-989244aa02cd X-Archives-Hash: 86cdc22bfff9dd1aff0924d751eff5e4 --Sig_W+cKtHo3bynaNisKm2r3ycB Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Tue, 20 Dec 2005 09:17:56 +0900 Kalin KOZHUHAROV <kalin@thinrope.net> wrote: | As far as speed is concerned, it is comparable with CVS. Be more specific please. We're looking for benchmarks showing how well it performs in terms of speed, bandwidth and memory usage for actions such as commit and update on a repository with 100k+ small files. --=20 Ciaran McCreesh : Gentoo Developer (I can kill you with my brain) Mail : ciaranm at gentoo.org Web : http://dev.gentoo.org/~ciaranm --Sig_W+cKtHo3bynaNisKm2r3ycB Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc Content-Disposition: attachment; filename=signature.asc -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.2 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQFDp1Da96zL6DUtXhERAqDkAKCV5Y4TBly78QFyme34aFaNPtq+2ACfX8xj BIyG8zzhHoqcUrGl550dXw8= =zrFS -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --Sig_W+cKtHo3bynaNisKm2r3ycB-- -- gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list