From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Received: from lists.gentoo.org ([140.105.134.102] helo=robin.gentoo.org)
	by nuthatch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.54)
	id 1EoVS6-00002k-Cr
	for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Tue, 20 Dec 2005 00:34:02 +0000
Received: from robin.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by robin.gentoo.org (8.13.5/8.13.5) with SMTP id jBK0XIgY032587;
	Tue, 20 Dec 2005 00:33:18 GMT
Received: from smtp.gentoo.org (smtp.gentoo.org [134.68.220.30])
	by robin.gentoo.org (8.13.5/8.13.5) with ESMTP id jBK0VQ0A005662
	for <gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org>; Tue, 20 Dec 2005 00:31:26 GMT
Received: from 82-41-57-20.cable.ubr08.edin.blueyonder.co.uk ([82.41.57.20] helo=snowdrop.home)
	by smtp.gentoo.org with esmtpa (Exim 4.54)
	id 1EoVPa-0007KK-5U
	for gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org; Tue, 20 Dec 2005 00:31:26 +0000
Received: from localhost.home ([127.0.0.1] helo=snowdrop.home)
	by snowdrop.home with esmtp (Exim 4.54)
	id 1EoVPX-0006Su-0b
	for gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org; Tue, 20 Dec 2005 00:31:23 +0000
Date: Tue, 20 Dec 2005 00:31:20 +0000
From: Ciaran McCreesh <ciaranm@gentoo.org>
To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org
Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Viability of other SCM/version control systems for
 big repo's
Message-ID: <20051220003120.595b486f@snowdrop.home>
In-Reply-To: <43A74DB4.7040504@thinrope.net>
References: <43A70D98.7070504@gentoo.org>
	<1135027076.28875.11.camel@localhost>
	<20051219213810.GA9392@ferdyx.org>
	<20051219215544.GD18849@butchest.cubesearch.com>
	<623652d50512191435x2209a2f6p@mail.gmail.com>
	<43A74DB4.7040504@thinrope.net>
X-Mailer: Sylpheed-Claws 2.0.0-rc1 (GTK+ 2.8.9; i686-pc-linux-gnu)
Precedence: bulk
List-Post: <mailto:gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gentoo-dev+help@gentoo.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:gentoo-dev+unsubscribe@gentoo.org>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:gentoo-dev+subscribe@gentoo.org>
List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail <gentoo-dev.gentoo.org>
X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@gentoo.org
Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary=Sig_W+cKtHo3bynaNisKm2r3ycB;
 protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg=PGP-SHA1
X-Archives-Salt: a2b57db4-32ac-4f8d-a46b-989244aa02cd
X-Archives-Hash: 86cdc22bfff9dd1aff0924d751eff5e4

--Sig_W+cKtHo3bynaNisKm2r3ycB
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

On Tue, 20 Dec 2005 09:17:56 +0900 Kalin KOZHUHAROV
<kalin@thinrope.net> wrote:
 | As far as speed is concerned, it is comparable with CVS.

Be more specific please. We're looking for benchmarks showing how well
it performs in terms of speed, bandwidth and memory usage for actions
such as commit and update on a repository with 100k+ small files.

--=20
Ciaran McCreesh : Gentoo Developer (I can kill you with my brain)
Mail            : ciaranm at gentoo.org
Web             : http://dev.gentoo.org/~ciaranm


--Sig_W+cKtHo3bynaNisKm2r3ycB
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc
Content-Disposition: attachment; filename=signature.asc

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.2 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQFDp1Da96zL6DUtXhERAqDkAKCV5Y4TBly78QFyme34aFaNPtq+2ACfX8xj
BIyG8zzhHoqcUrGl550dXw8=
=zrFS
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--Sig_W+cKtHo3bynaNisKm2r3ycB--
-- 
gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list