From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from lists.gentoo.org ([140.105.134.102] helo=robin.gentoo.org) by nuthatch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.54) id 1EoSn1-00024c-F2 for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Mon, 19 Dec 2005 21:43:27 +0000 Received: from robin.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.13.5/8.13.5) with SMTP id jBJLg1J1011690; Mon, 19 Dec 2005 21:42:01 GMT Received: from smtp.ferdyx.org (170.Red-213-96-222.staticIP.rima-tde.net [213.96.222.170]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.13.5/8.13.5) with ESMTP id jBJLcF4c010659 for ; Mon, 19 Dec 2005 21:38:15 GMT Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by smtp.ferdyx.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 27FAC8D318 for ; Mon, 19 Dec 2005 22:37:57 +0100 (CET) Received: from smtp.ferdyx.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (tungsteno [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 00329-10 for ; Mon, 19 Dec 2005 22:37:54 +0100 (CET) Received: from posidon.ferdyx.org (posidon.ferdyx.org [192.168.0.2]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.ferdyx.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F10F88D30B for ; Mon, 19 Dec 2005 22:37:53 +0100 (CET) Received: by posidon.ferdyx.org (nbSMTP-1.01-cvs) for uid 1000 (using TLSv1/SSLv3 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) ferdy@gentoo.org; Mon, 19 Dec 2005 22:38:11 +0100 (CET) Date: Mon, 19 Dec 2005 22:38:10 +0100 From: "Fernando J. Pereda" To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Viability of other SCM/version control systems for big repo's Message-ID: <20051219213810.GA9392@ferdyx.org> Mail-Followup-To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org References: <43A70D98.7070504@gentoo.org> <1135027076.28875.11.camel@localhost> Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="rwEMma7ioTxnRzrJ" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <1135027076.28875.11.camel@localhost> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.11 X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new-20030616-p10 (Debian) at ferdyx.org X-Archives-Salt: d26770ba-c47c-4a3a-a07c-478768dec586 X-Archives-Hash: 0f16dea534a7172232e97d99e926d4d8 --rwEMma7ioTxnRzrJ Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Mon, Dec 19, 2005 at 10:17:56PM +0100, Patrick Lauer wrote: | http://www.keltia.net/EuroBSDCon/slides.pdf has some performance data on | mercurial for FreeBSD, roughly the same size as the Gentoo cvs | repositories.=20 It's not the size of the repo what matters... it is the workflow. I don't know how they work... but I definately don't think ours suits in a distributed SCM as Ciaran pointed out. Cheers, Ferdy --=20 Fernando J. Pereda Garcimart=EDn Gentoo Developer (Alpha,net-mail,mutt,git) 20BB BDC3 761A 4781 E6ED ED0B 0A48 5B0C 60BD 28D4 --rwEMma7ioTxnRzrJ Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.2 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQFDpyhCCkhbDGC9KNQRAq2aAJ9muw25xKcCW0NCaNek2g9xGNzZBQCePgnt ICvlBl/mN1AFUhgyO4JQq4U= =ab0H -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --rwEMma7ioTxnRzrJ-- -- gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list