From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from lists.gentoo.org ([140.105.134.102] helo=robin.gentoo.org) by nuthatch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.54) id 1EoRXC-0002cm-UR for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Mon, 19 Dec 2005 20:23:03 +0000 Received: from robin.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.13.5/8.13.5) with SMTP id jBJKMHbQ023640; Mon, 19 Dec 2005 20:22:17 GMT Received: from smtp.gentoo.org (smtp.gentoo.org [134.68.220.30]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.13.5/8.13.5) with ESMTP id jBJKKOhR024819 for ; Mon, 19 Dec 2005 20:20:24 GMT Received: from vapier by smtp.gentoo.org with local (Exim 4.54) id 1EoRUe-00016B-4n for gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org; Mon, 19 Dec 2005 20:20:24 +0000 Date: Mon, 19 Dec 2005 20:20:24 +0000 From: Mike Frysinger To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Viability of other SCM/version control systems for big repo's Message-ID: <20051219202024.GD12549@toucan.gentoo.org> References: <43A70D98.7070504@gentoo.org> <20051219200419.06d134e9@snowdrop.home> Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20051219200419.06d134e9@snowdrop.home> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.11 X-Archives-Salt: 706a1ddf-62a4-4b3a-8338-5df242ac0f85 X-Archives-Hash: 5bf0c21cf7822b8dd0b246561715b72a On Mon, Dec 19, 2005 at 08:04:19PM +0000, Ciaran McCreesh wrote: > On Mon, 19 Dec 2005 11:44:24 -0800 Donnie Berkholz > wrote: > | I know some of you have done research on how gentoo-x86 converts over > | to other systems besides CVS such as SVN, arch, etc. But I can't find > | the info anywhere in my archives. > > As for Arch, I managed to find three different "FATAL ERROR!" bugs in > tla within the first five minutes of using it. Two of them were > reported and known, with no fix forthcoming. Plus, we don't use a > distributed development model so Arch doesn't really suit us... along those same lines, ive used monotone with a project or two and found it to be highly unstable and very incompatible across minor releases -mike -- gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list