From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from lists.gentoo.org ([140.105.134.102] helo=robin.gentoo.org) by nuthatch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.54) id 1EnmHk-0006dW-JM for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Sun, 18 Dec 2005 00:20:21 +0000 Received: from robin.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.13.5/8.13.5) with SMTP id jBI0JCoF019624; Sun, 18 Dec 2005 00:19:12 GMT Received: from cubert.e-centre.net (morbo.e-centre.net [66.154.82.3]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.13.5/8.13.5) with ESMTP id jBI0Ecie021484 for ; Sun, 18 Dec 2005 00:14:38 GMT Received: from [10.3.1.19] (helo=barracuda2.stayonline.net) by cubert.e-centre.net with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1EnmCE-0006Vg-4v for gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org; Sat, 17 Dec 2005 19:14:38 -0500 X-ASG-Debug-ID: 1134864877-1594-50-0 X-Barracuda-URL: http://10.3.1.19:8000/cgi-bin/mark.cgi Received: from et-pdx-2.site.stayonline.net (unknown [65.200.64.131]) by barracuda2.stayonline.net (Spam Firewall) with ESMTP id 63DF0B2060 for ; Sat, 17 Dec 2005 19:14:37 -0500 (EST) Received: from nightcrawler ([172.16.1.202]) by et-pdx-2.site.stayonline.net (8.12.6/8.12.6) with ESMTP id jBI0EO5j021034 for ; Sun, 18 Dec 2005 00:14:24 GMT Date: Sat, 17 Dec 2005 16:14:15 -0800 From: Brian Harring To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org X-ASG-Orig-Subj: Re: [gentoo-dev] draft glep: multi-repo Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] draft glep: multi-repo Message-ID: <20051218001415.GD22142@nightcrawler.e-centre.net> References: <43A3C9A8.9050608@leetworks.com> <20051217231548.GB22142@nightcrawler.e-centre.net> <20051217232558.6bfccdab@snowdrop.home> Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="6Nae48J/T25AfBN4" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20051217232558.6bfccdab@snowdrop.home> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.11 X-Virus-Scanned: by Barracuda Spam Firewall at stayonline.net X-Barracuda-Spam-Score: 0.00 X-Barracuda-Spam-Status: No, SCORE=0.00 using global scores of TAG_LEVEL=1000.0 QUARANTINE_LEVEL=1000.0 KILL_LEVEL=4.0 tests= X-Barracuda-Spam-Report: Code version 3.02, rules version 3.0.6392 Rule breakdown below pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- X-Archives-Salt: 5ce1830c-821a-4fb2-948f-40f3fd78b9a4 X-Archives-Hash: a398bfbdb4a68d28fc79a3b4c6636add --6Nae48J/T25AfBN4 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf8 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Sat, Dec 17, 2005 at 11:25:58PM +0000, Ciaran McCreesh wrote: > On Sat, 17 Dec 2005 15:15:48 -0800 Brian Harring > wrote: > | True stand alone repository capabilities aren't required/bound to=20 > | glep42, all that's required out of glep42 is that the syncing repo id > | be used now (even if it may seem superfluous). Iow, news *should*=20 > | work regardless if it's an overlay or a stand alone repo. >=20 > Not quite true. I also need to know how to handle Display-If-Installed > and Display-If-Profile headers with multiple repositories. Hence why > I'd prefer to leave it as "something that can easily be implemented in > the future"... News is repo specific. What I stated in the glep42 thread email=20 covers this already; zmedico already adress Display-If-Profile=20 (namely, a simple portageq extension). What remaining straw men are there for ignoring the portage=20 developers requests? ~harring --6Nae48J/T25AfBN4 Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.1 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQFDpKnXvdBxRoA3VU0RAjWBAJ4jH9HFXaxHNfM98+/eFTT/TWgbqACgp0ZX HJPyxNWh2H2lvI4kKH9MN+U= =PuI8 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --6Nae48J/T25AfBN4-- -- gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list