From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from lists.gentoo.org ([140.105.134.102] helo=robin.gentoo.org) by nuthatch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.54) id 1EnJr0-0006qt-A6 for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Fri, 16 Dec 2005 17:58:50 +0000 Received: from robin.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.13.5/8.13.5) with SMTP id jBGHvYZP026975; Fri, 16 Dec 2005 17:57:34 GMT Received: from smtp.gentoo.org (smtp.gentoo.org [134.68.220.30]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.13.5/8.13.5) with ESMTP id jBGHsc09008156 for ; Fri, 16 Dec 2005 17:54:39 GMT Received: from 82-41-57-20.cable.ubr08.edin.blueyonder.co.uk ([82.41.57.20] helo=snowdrop.home) by smtp.gentoo.org with esmtpa (Exim 4.54) id 1EnJmw-0005xG-48 for gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org; Fri, 16 Dec 2005 17:54:38 +0000 Received: from localhost.home ([127.0.0.1] helo=snowdrop.home) by snowdrop.home with esmtp (Exim 4.54) id 1EnJmr-0008Cu-U1 for gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org; Fri, 16 Dec 2005 17:54:33 +0000 Date: Fri, 16 Dec 2005 17:54:31 +0000 From: Ciaran McCreesh To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Multiple Repo Support Message-ID: <20051216175431.51b59e53@snowdrop.home> In-Reply-To: <43A28212.8040302@gentoo.org> References: <43A235AD.6030604@leetworks.com> <20051216035630.2b005138@snowdrop.home> <43A25276.7080703@egr.msu.edu> <43A28212.8040302@gentoo.org> X-Mailer: Sylpheed-Claws 2.0.0-rc1 (GTK+ 2.8.9; i686-pc-linux-gnu) Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="Sig_E=pp=Ua83ei8w_EWnyU9L2h"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg=PGP-SHA1 X-Archives-Salt: fc636eb4-d2bd-4adc-be64-6746564c7329 X-Archives-Hash: b1701ac96aba28218c878e5c8a835803 --Sig_E=pp=Ua83ei8w_EWnyU9L2h Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Fri, 16 Dec 2005 10:00:02 +0100 Danny van Dyk wrote: | Just one remark: What about making the syntax a bit more familiar to | C++ users: |=20 | ~ DEPENDS=3D"gentoo-foo::foo-bar/baz-2.1" That was my original thought when I started playing with it. I switched to postfix to make it more consistent with the way :slot and [use] restrictions work. *shrug* I guess it's down to whether you consider a repository to be a top level object that contains categories, or whether you view your package db as the union of "all stuff in all repositories", and have the repository restriction as a restriction. --=20 Ciaran McCreesh : Gentoo Developer (I can kill you with my brain) Mail : ciaranm at gentoo.org Web : http://dev.gentoo.org/~ciaranm --Sig_E=pp=Ua83ei8w_EWnyU9L2h Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc Content-Disposition: attachment; filename=signature.asc -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.2 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQFDov9Z96zL6DUtXhERAoRzAJ401DPMdmiGm0klF+wBCK4BtyIscQCeKFjK 4Oe3xeh8yF/OmLNjoalTkW4= =iGTw -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --Sig_E=pp=Ua83ei8w_EWnyU9L2h-- -- gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list