From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from lists.gentoo.org ([140.105.134.102] helo=robin.gentoo.org) by nuthatch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.54) id 1EmtyH-0002et-P9 for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Thu, 15 Dec 2005 14:20:38 +0000 Received: from robin.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.13.5/8.13.5) with SMTP id jBFEJqtE027221; Thu, 15 Dec 2005 14:19:52 GMT Received: from wproxy.gmail.com (wproxy.gmail.com [64.233.184.207]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.13.5/8.13.5) with ESMTP id jBFEI1F2031246 for ; Thu, 15 Dec 2005 14:18:02 GMT Received: by wproxy.gmail.com with SMTP id 69so627831wri for ; Thu, 15 Dec 2005 06:18:01 -0800 (PST) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:from:to:subject:date:user-agent:references:in-reply-to:x-face:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:message-id:sender; b=HAAo2u2waEVigO+yjMLAt1iwTAthxqGocbqny2WgiSSaim35PFT0MOFWzfq62o7ZuJ2LKwgy0Y7Vbvbc2etUlLXlyUFIS/hCTKnm99+T8CCmF8pV9V6kDy6QBOz+k6mFWRWe3lzQ7QRHYoSwSXF5c06BjyiwZyVi+EeACs1TLi4= Received: by 10.54.154.8 with SMTP id b8mr2173791wre; Thu, 15 Dec 2005 06:18:01 -0800 (PST) Received: from enterprise.flameeyes.is-a-geek.org ( [151.44.28.190]) by mx.gmail.com with ESMTP id g3sm2319167wra.2005.12.15.06.18.00; Thu, 15 Dec 2005 06:18:00 -0800 (PST) From: "Diego 'Flameeyes' =?utf-8?q?Petten=C3=B2?=" To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Optimizing performance Date: Thu, 15 Dec 2005 15:17:46 +0100 User-Agent: KMail/1.9 References: <1134650885.4634.57.camel@localhost> <43A1731C.4010806@gentoo.org> In-Reply-To: <43A1731C.4010806@gentoo.org> X-Face: +=-v@W}H`=.Bn2t&97Un7{[.c0aP0"8)JI?7Z?E>l>ZNY|,=?utf-8?q?mL=5C3bs=0A=09xW=23jRz=7CVa=5C?=@NIS3-'W[F.^YLqK=rS:D*Ke`Y5giI@$(xIBQ<0i740;wuI{lYd>>=?utf-8?q?eFVDuAr=0A=09=3Br=5B*=7E/zd=604dEI?= Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="nextPart4247946.Wjn8MMbleW"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg=pgp-sha1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: <200512151517.57116@enterprise.flameeyes.is-a-geek.org> Sender: "=?UTF-8?Q?Diego=20\"Flameeyes\"=20Petten=C3=B2?=" X-Archives-Salt: 01915a3e-1296-4d6c-80cc-64345a24232c X-Archives-Hash: 5fbaef538de6fd6f94d41d1fd849423e --nextPart4247946.Wjn8MMbleW Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline On Thursday 15 December 2005 14:43, Francesco Riosa wrote: > Some upstreams, mostly media related but also unsuspectable like MySQL, > use and test their apps with high optimizations. Not exactly true.. many media related upstreams forces "ricing" flags=20 (-fomg-so-fast) on packages, but that does not really mean it's more stable= =20 that way... actually, xine-lib proved to be way more stable while *not* usi= ng=20 ricing CFLAGS. The actual problem there is that many packages have code that breaks if you= =20 remove those flags, so for example xine-lib has to foce a few flags on to=20 work fine (on x86). =2D-=20 Diego "Flameeyes" Petten=C3=B2 - http://dev.gentoo.org/~flameeyes/ Gentoo/ALT lead, Gentoo/FreeBSD, Video, AMD64, Sound, PAM, KDE --nextPart4247946.Wjn8MMbleW Content-Type: application/pgp-signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.2 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQBDoXsVe2h1+2mHVWMRAlfSAJ44EGL/jLIevhTvUhiKtYYV2K8qxACgxPGB Awk+DzdhOhsiIgvgZNpvENs= =ZHBu -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --nextPart4247946.Wjn8MMbleW-- -- gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list