From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from lists.gentoo.org ([140.105.134.102] helo=robin.gentoo.org) by nuthatch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.54) id 1EmX8Q-0006aj-AW for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Wed, 14 Dec 2005 13:57:34 +0000 Received: from robin.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.13.5/8.13.5) with SMTP id jBEDuohe030812; Wed, 14 Dec 2005 13:56:50 GMT Received: from smtp.gentoo.org (smtp.gentoo.org [134.68.220.30]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.13.5/8.13.5) with ESMTP id jBEDt0ts009286 for ; Wed, 14 Dec 2005 13:55:00 GMT Received: from vapier by smtp.gentoo.org with local (Exim 4.54) id 1EmX5w-000313-D9 for gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org; Wed, 14 Dec 2005 13:55:00 +0000 Date: Wed, 14 Dec 2005 13:55:00 +0000 From: Mike Frysinger To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Gee, wouldn't it be nice (security bugs)... Message-ID: <20051214135500.GC22730@toucan.gentoo.org> References: <1134558021.6530.3.camel@sys947.dtic.mil> Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <1134558021.6530.3.camel@sys947.dtic.mil> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.11 X-Archives-Salt: fda89056-929f-4fe3-b16d-bf83b04522ed X-Archives-Hash: 0a3314ca23217a6aff989c6d33d61030 On Wed, Dec 14, 2005 at 06:00:21AM -0500, Michael Cummings wrote: > Gee, wouldn't it be nice for us lazy folks if the word [Security] (in > some common fashion) were included in the summary line of security > related bugs? this really should have been sent to the security mailing list and cc-ed the security team this has come up before on those lists, i just dont remember the outcome :P -mike -- gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list