From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Received: from lists.gentoo.org ([140.105.134.102] helo=robin.gentoo.org)
	by nuthatch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.54)
	id 1EmHVu-0001wM-E4
	for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Tue, 13 Dec 2005 21:16:46 +0000
Received: from robin.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by robin.gentoo.org (8.13.5/8.13.5) with SMTP id jBDLDVlM010672;
	Tue, 13 Dec 2005 21:13:31 GMT
Received: from smtp.gentoo.org (smtp.gentoo.org [134.68.220.30])
	by robin.gentoo.org (8.13.5/8.13.5) with ESMTP id jBDL9fFd013010
	for <gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org>; Tue, 13 Dec 2005 21:09:41 GMT
Received: from 82-41-57-20.cable.ubr08.edin.blueyonder.co.uk ([82.41.57.20] helo=snowdrop.home)
	by smtp.gentoo.org with esmtpa (Exim 4.54)
	id 1EmHOw-0004ru-0e
	for gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org; Tue, 13 Dec 2005 21:09:34 +0000
Received: from localhost.home ([127.0.0.1] helo=snowdrop.home)
	by snowdrop.home with esmtp (Exim 4.54)
	id 1EmHOt-0004rv-Df
	for gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org; Tue, 13 Dec 2005 21:09:31 +0000
Date: Tue, 13 Dec 2005 21:09:29 +0000
From: Ciaran McCreesh <ciaranm@gentoo.org>
To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org
Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Changes to date format of current GLEPs (was:	GLEP
 42 (Critical News Reporting) round five)
Message-ID: <20051213210929.6571b7ff@snowdrop.home>
In-Reply-To: <1134507225.26856.33.camel@cocagne.max-t.internal>
References: <20051213032043.55a6e40f@snowdrop.home>
	<20051213195522.GA15503@dmz.brixandersen.dk>
	<20051213200329.6f303cf6@snowdrop.home>
	<439F30A0.40104@gentoo.org>
	<20051213204342.1f2cf2ee@snowdrop.home>
	<1134507225.26856.33.camel@cocagne.max-t.internal>
X-Mailer: Sylpheed-Claws 2.0.0-rc1 (GTK+ 2.8.8; i686-pc-linux-gnu)
Precedence: bulk
List-Post: <mailto:gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gentoo-dev+help@gentoo.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:gentoo-dev+unsubscribe@gentoo.org>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:gentoo-dev+subscribe@gentoo.org>
List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail <gentoo-dev.gentoo.org>
X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@gentoo.org
Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="Sig_TDYvJxh9Zr=yqkjrg9q2ZXN";
 protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg=PGP-SHA1
X-Archives-Salt: 27ae916a-a2b4-4504-97ac-c4582a151d6b
X-Archives-Hash: 27fb578a0677b91dc0f48ff33cf86516

--Sig_TDYvJxh9Zr=yqkjrg9q2ZXN
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

On Tue, 13 Dec 2005 15:53:45 -0500 Olivier Crete <tester@gentoo.org>
wrote:
| Why not just modify GlEP 1 ?

Going back and retroactively modifying standards is icky, and it
*still* doesn't address the issue of documenting why the change was
made.

You know, a GLEP could have been written and posted by now :)

--=20
Ciaran McCreesh : Gentoo Developer (I can kill you with my brain)
Mail            : ciaranm at gentoo.org
Web             : http://dev.gentoo.org/~ciaranm


--Sig_TDYvJxh9Zr=yqkjrg9q2ZXN
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc
Content-Disposition: attachment; filename=signature.asc

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.2 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQFDnziL96zL6DUtXhERArsFAJ0bUcZExUBhOLrSFe4QKKfiGZ8ruwCgpUty
CyX/7waxWcQitLbHiktVDZc=
=bRls
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--Sig_TDYvJxh9Zr=yqkjrg9q2ZXN--
-- 
gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list