From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from lists.gentoo.org ([140.105.134.102] helo=robin.gentoo.org) by nuthatch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.54) id 1EmHVu-0001wM-E4 for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Tue, 13 Dec 2005 21:16:46 +0000 Received: from robin.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.13.5/8.13.5) with SMTP id jBDLDVlM010672; Tue, 13 Dec 2005 21:13:31 GMT Received: from smtp.gentoo.org (smtp.gentoo.org [134.68.220.30]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.13.5/8.13.5) with ESMTP id jBDL9fFd013010 for <gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org>; Tue, 13 Dec 2005 21:09:41 GMT Received: from 82-41-57-20.cable.ubr08.edin.blueyonder.co.uk ([82.41.57.20] helo=snowdrop.home) by smtp.gentoo.org with esmtpa (Exim 4.54) id 1EmHOw-0004ru-0e for gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org; Tue, 13 Dec 2005 21:09:34 +0000 Received: from localhost.home ([127.0.0.1] helo=snowdrop.home) by snowdrop.home with esmtp (Exim 4.54) id 1EmHOt-0004rv-Df for gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org; Tue, 13 Dec 2005 21:09:31 +0000 Date: Tue, 13 Dec 2005 21:09:29 +0000 From: Ciaran McCreesh <ciaranm@gentoo.org> To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Changes to date format of current GLEPs (was: GLEP 42 (Critical News Reporting) round five) Message-ID: <20051213210929.6571b7ff@snowdrop.home> In-Reply-To: <1134507225.26856.33.camel@cocagne.max-t.internal> References: <20051213032043.55a6e40f@snowdrop.home> <20051213195522.GA15503@dmz.brixandersen.dk> <20051213200329.6f303cf6@snowdrop.home> <439F30A0.40104@gentoo.org> <20051213204342.1f2cf2ee@snowdrop.home> <1134507225.26856.33.camel@cocagne.max-t.internal> X-Mailer: Sylpheed-Claws 2.0.0-rc1 (GTK+ 2.8.8; i686-pc-linux-gnu) Precedence: bulk List-Post: <mailto:gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org> List-Help: <mailto:gentoo-dev+help@gentoo.org> List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:gentoo-dev+unsubscribe@gentoo.org> List-Subscribe: <mailto:gentoo-dev+subscribe@gentoo.org> List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail <gentoo-dev.gentoo.org> X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="Sig_TDYvJxh9Zr=yqkjrg9q2ZXN"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg=PGP-SHA1 X-Archives-Salt: 27ae916a-a2b4-4504-97ac-c4582a151d6b X-Archives-Hash: 27fb578a0677b91dc0f48ff33cf86516 --Sig_TDYvJxh9Zr=yqkjrg9q2ZXN Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Tue, 13 Dec 2005 15:53:45 -0500 Olivier Crete <tester@gentoo.org> wrote: | Why not just modify GlEP 1 ? Going back and retroactively modifying standards is icky, and it *still* doesn't address the issue of documenting why the change was made. You know, a GLEP could have been written and posted by now :) --=20 Ciaran McCreesh : Gentoo Developer (I can kill you with my brain) Mail : ciaranm at gentoo.org Web : http://dev.gentoo.org/~ciaranm --Sig_TDYvJxh9Zr=yqkjrg9q2ZXN Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc Content-Disposition: attachment; filename=signature.asc -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.2 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQFDnziL96zL6DUtXhERArsFAJ0bUcZExUBhOLrSFe4QKKfiGZ8ruwCgpUty CyX/7waxWcQitLbHiktVDZc= =bRls -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --Sig_TDYvJxh9Zr=yqkjrg9q2ZXN-- -- gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list