From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from lists.gentoo.org ([140.105.134.102] helo=robin.gentoo.org) by nuthatch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.54) id 1EmHeg-0000q1-4W for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Tue, 13 Dec 2005 21:25:50 +0000 Received: from robin.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.13.5/8.13.5) with SMTP id jBDL9d8j007678; Tue, 13 Dec 2005 21:09:40 GMT Received: from smtp.gentoo.org (smtp.gentoo.org [134.68.220.30]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.13.5/8.13.5) with ESMTP id jBDL0GBJ009913 for <gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org>; Tue, 13 Dec 2005 21:00:17 GMT Received: from 82-41-57-20.cable.ubr08.edin.blueyonder.co.uk ([82.41.57.20] helo=snowdrop.home) by smtp.gentoo.org with esmtpa (Exim 4.54) id 1EmHFw-0007cm-PS for gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org; Tue, 13 Dec 2005 21:00:16 +0000 Received: from localhost.home ([127.0.0.1] helo=snowdrop.home) by snowdrop.home with esmtp (Exim 4.54) id 1EmHFu-0004q9-NB for gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org; Tue, 13 Dec 2005 21:00:14 +0000 Date: Tue, 13 Dec 2005 21:00:12 +0000 From: Ciaran McCreesh <ciaranm@gentoo.org> To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: Changes to date format of current GLEPs Message-ID: <20051213210012.4bedb1fc@snowdrop.home> In-Reply-To: <439F3518.5090909@gentoo.org> References: <20051213032043.55a6e40f@snowdrop.home> <20051213195522.GA15503@dmz.brixandersen.dk> <20051213200329.6f303cf6@snowdrop.home> <439F30A0.40104@gentoo.org> <46059ce10512131236o472af58bwe267cdf9638c420a@mail.gmail.com> <439F3518.5090909@gentoo.org> X-Mailer: Sylpheed-Claws 2.0.0-rc1 (GTK+ 2.8.8; i686-pc-linux-gnu) Precedence: bulk List-Post: <mailto:gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org> List-Help: <mailto:gentoo-dev+help@gentoo.org> List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:gentoo-dev+unsubscribe@gentoo.org> List-Subscribe: <mailto:gentoo-dev+subscribe@gentoo.org> List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail <gentoo-dev.gentoo.org> X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary=Sig_MAsKAACHRoe3MZl2XGUYMwN; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg=PGP-SHA1 X-Archives-Salt: a59132bc-b4ab-49b6-8b98-e162949fc61f X-Archives-Hash: 53b5c1a513ba8fea9cf60ae9338bd473 --Sig_MAsKAACHRoe3MZl2XGUYMwN Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Tue, 13 Dec 2005 21:54:48 +0100 Danny van Dyk <kugelfang@gentoo.org> wrote: | Do you _really_ think this make a GLEP necessary? Yes. Otherwise, the next person who comes along and writes a GLEP that does something to do with dates will have to rationalise the whole date format decision all over again. You're assuming that "GLEP =3D=3D lots of work". This is the case for some things, but it isn't true in all situations. Look at 43 for an example. --=20 Ciaran McCreesh : Gentoo Developer (I can kill you with my brain) Mail : ciaranm at gentoo.org Web : http://dev.gentoo.org/~ciaranm --Sig_MAsKAACHRoe3MZl2XGUYMwN Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc Content-Disposition: attachment; filename=signature.asc -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.2 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQFDnzZe96zL6DUtXhERAo6QAKDee1p67z3gJXKLamnFcJsUxTvGPwCgifAk ocZEus4h8FKulZt1cWF7ntc= =yz/w -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --Sig_MAsKAACHRoe3MZl2XGUYMwN-- -- gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list