From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Received: from lists.gentoo.org ([140.105.134.102] helo=robin.gentoo.org)
	by nuthatch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.54)
	id 1EmHKR-0007Bi-3y
	for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Tue, 13 Dec 2005 21:04:55 +0000
Received: from robin.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by robin.gentoo.org (8.13.5/8.13.5) with SMTP id jBDL1qCs024660;
	Tue, 13 Dec 2005 21:01:52 GMT
Received: from smtp.gentoo.org (smtp.gentoo.org [134.68.220.30])
	by robin.gentoo.org (8.13.5/8.13.5) with ESMTP id jBDKqnt8004990
	for <gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org>; Tue, 13 Dec 2005 20:52:49 GMT
Received: from 82-41-57-20.cable.ubr08.edin.blueyonder.co.uk ([82.41.57.20] helo=snowdrop.home)
	by smtp.gentoo.org with esmtpa (Exim 4.54)
	id 1EmH8i-0004MA-Sv
	for gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org; Tue, 13 Dec 2005 20:52:49 +0000
Received: from localhost.home ([127.0.0.1] helo=snowdrop.home)
	by snowdrop.home with esmtp (Exim 4.54)
	id 1EmH8g-0004nc-OW
	for gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org; Tue, 13 Dec 2005 20:52:46 +0000
Date: Tue, 13 Dec 2005 20:52:44 +0000
From: Ciaran McCreesh <ciaranm@gentoo.org>
To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org
Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: Changes to date format of current GLEPs (was:
 GLEP 42 (Critical News Reporting) round five)
Message-ID: <20051213205244.43a5af0a@snowdrop.home>
In-Reply-To: <20051213204442.GJ26791@toucan.gentoo.org>
References: <20051213032043.55a6e40f@snowdrop.home>
	<20051213195522.GA15503@dmz.brixandersen.dk>
	<20051213200329.6f303cf6@snowdrop.home>
	<439F30A0.40104@gentoo.org>
	<46059ce10512131236o472af58bwe267cdf9638c420a@mail.gmail.com>
	<20051213204442.GJ26791@toucan.gentoo.org>
X-Mailer: Sylpheed-Claws 2.0.0-rc1 (GTK+ 2.8.8; i686-pc-linux-gnu)
Precedence: bulk
List-Post: <mailto:gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gentoo-dev+help@gentoo.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:gentoo-dev+unsubscribe@gentoo.org>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:gentoo-dev+subscribe@gentoo.org>
List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail <gentoo-dev.gentoo.org>
X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@gentoo.org
Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary=Sig_yN_mfiuOrS_74fcYYyhJTP0;
 protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg=PGP-SHA1
X-Archives-Salt: de53a4f7-e916-424c-b2cf-242e049775ac
X-Archives-Hash: f8b4f7184854e11271cce0c99b54820d

--Sig_yN_mfiuOrS_74fcYYyhJTP0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

On Tue, 13 Dec 2005 20:44:42 +0000 Mike Frysinger <vapier@gentoo.org>
wrote:
| On Tue, Dec 13, 2005 at 03:36:33PM -0500, Dan Meltzer wrote:
| > Well, it would be changing Glep 1... which probably needs an
| > ammendatory GLEP
|=20
| or we avoid all the redtape bs and just do it, let anarchy rule

It's not a question of red tape. Red tape would be requiring that the
GLEP be approved by twenty six different managers and team leads. It's
a question of having the change documented properly so that future GLEP
authors don't get bitten, and so that future GLEP authors understand
the rationale so that they don't go and introduce something that has
the same problems as the GLEP 1 date format.

--=20
Ciaran McCreesh : Gentoo Developer (I can kill you with my brain)
Mail            : ciaranm at gentoo.org
Web             : http://dev.gentoo.org/~ciaranm


--Sig_yN_mfiuOrS_74fcYYyhJTP0
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc
Content-Disposition: attachment; filename=signature.asc

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.2 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQFDnzSe96zL6DUtXhERAnmkAJ98nwF0eUuJLkpJSFP09gUArduQdwCfW6Hn
67uzcBkMUX0/MICPLwmj42E=
=/W55
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--Sig_yN_mfiuOrS_74fcYYyhJTP0--
-- 
gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list