From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from lists.gentoo.org ([140.105.134.102] helo=robin.gentoo.org) by nuthatch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.54) id 1Em08u-0003Fx-Pn for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Tue, 13 Dec 2005 02:43:53 +0000 Received: from robin.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.13.5/8.13.5) with SMTP id jBD2gXRh002038; Tue, 13 Dec 2005 02:42:33 GMT Received: from smtp.gentoo.org (smtp.gentoo.org [134.68.220.30]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.13.5/8.13.5) with ESMTP id jBD2dQcw001534 for ; Tue, 13 Dec 2005 02:39:26 GMT Received: from jj039137.ppp.dion.ne.jp ([211.4.39.137] helo=opteron246.suzuki-stubbs.home) by smtp.gentoo.org with esmtpa (Exim 4.54) id 1Em04b-0000O0-WC for gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org; Tue, 13 Dec 2005 02:39:26 +0000 Received: by opteron246.suzuki-stubbs.home (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 37DAC201A48; Tue, 13 Dec 2005 11:39:49 +0900 (JST) From: Jason Stubbs To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] GLEP XX: Fix the GLEP process Date: Tue, 13 Dec 2005 11:39:49 +0900 User-Agent: KMail/1.9 References: <200512131106.54567.jstubbs@gentoo.org> <200512131115.43287.jstubbs@gentoo.org> <20051213022442.537298bd@snowdrop.home> In-Reply-To: <20051213022442.537298bd@snowdrop.home> Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200512131139.49116.jstubbs@gentoo.org> X-Archives-Salt: 7e16d2e5-9074-48cb-b698-036557425e7b X-Archives-Hash: 4978d6de770c9dbb082a11ed714a2296 On Tuesday 13 December 2005 11:24, Ciaran McCreesh wrote: > On Tue, 13 Dec 2005 11:15:43 +0900 Jason Stubbs > > wrote: > | A GLEP should list whom has been solicited and provide evidence that > | each has given their explicit approval of the GLEP. A GLEP without > | explicit approval of all teams involved cannot receive managerial > | approval. > > So... If, hypothetically speaking, someone were to write a GLEP saying > "move developer documentation into the QA group, restructure said > documentation to this new format etc etc", and the QA group were in > favour, and the developer community in general were in favour, and the > council were in favour, and the people proposed by the GLEP to manage > the new documentation were in favour, but the existing owners of the > developer documentation were not, you're saying that it shouldn't be > approved? Yes. -- Jason Stubbs -- gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list