From: Ciaran McCreesh <ciaranm@gentoo.org>
To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org
Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] GLEP XX: Fix the GLEP process
Date: Tue, 13 Dec 2005 02:58:32 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20051213025832.50478861@snowdrop.home> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <200512131139.49116.jstubbs@gentoo.org>
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1090 bytes --]
On Tue, 13 Dec 2005 11:39:49 +0900 Jason Stubbs <jstubbs@gentoo.org>
wrote:
| > So... If, hypothetically speaking, someone were to write a GLEP
| > saying "move developer documentation into the QA group, restructure
| > said documentation to this new format etc etc", and the QA group
| > were in favour, and the developer community in general were in
| > favour, and the council were in favour, and the people proposed by
| > the GLEP to manage the new documentation were in favour, but the
| > existing owners of the developer documentation were not, you're
| > saying that it shouldn't be approved?
|
| Yes.
Unworkable. Your proposal would allow a small group of obstinate
developers to hold back progress. The problem here is that the council
isn't acting as a decent last line of quality control when the GLEP
authors fail to do their jobs properly. Your GLEP is trying to solve
the wrong thing...
--
Ciaran McCreesh : Gentoo Developer (I can kill you with my brain)
Mail : ciaranm at gentoo.org
Web : http://dev.gentoo.org/~ciaranm
[-- Attachment #2: signature.asc --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 189 bytes --]
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2005-12-13 3:01 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2005-12-13 2:06 [gentoo-dev] GLEP XX: Fix the GLEP process Jason Stubbs
2005-12-13 2:15 ` Jason Stubbs
2005-12-13 2:24 ` Ciaran McCreesh
2005-12-13 2:35 ` [gentoo-dev] " Dan Meltzer
2005-12-13 2:42 ` Ciaran McCreesh
2005-12-13 9:31 ` George Shapovalov
2005-12-13 2:39 ` [gentoo-dev] " Jason Stubbs
2005-12-13 2:58 ` Ciaran McCreesh [this message]
2005-12-13 14:11 ` Jason Stubbs
2005-12-13 21:16 ` Grant Goodyear
2005-12-14 16:16 ` Jason Stubbs
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20051213025832.50478861@snowdrop.home \
--to=ciaranm@gentoo.org \
--cc=gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox