From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from lists.gentoo.org ([140.105.134.102] helo=robin.gentoo.org) by nuthatch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.54) id 1Elzt3-0007Zz-V8 for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Tue, 13 Dec 2005 02:27:30 +0000 Received: from robin.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.13.5/8.13.5) with SMTP id jBD2Qk1R026637; Tue, 13 Dec 2005 02:26:46 GMT Received: from smtp.gentoo.org (smtp.gentoo.org [134.68.220.30]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.13.5/8.13.5) with ESMTP id jBD2Ok2e028318 for ; Tue, 13 Dec 2005 02:24:47 GMT Received: from 82-41-57-20.cable.ubr08.edin.blueyonder.co.uk ([82.41.57.20] helo=snowdrop.home) by smtp.gentoo.org with esmtpa (Exim 4.54) id 1ElzqQ-0004r9-Hy for gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org; Tue, 13 Dec 2005 02:24:46 +0000 Received: from localhost.home ([127.0.0.1] helo=snowdrop.home) by snowdrop.home with esmtp (Exim 4.54) id 1ElzqO-0007Kw-QT for gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org; Tue, 13 Dec 2005 02:24:44 +0000 Date: Tue, 13 Dec 2005 02:24:42 +0000 From: Ciaran McCreesh To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] GLEP XX: Fix the GLEP process Message-ID: <20051213022442.537298bd@snowdrop.home> In-Reply-To: <200512131115.43287.jstubbs@gentoo.org> References: <200512131106.54567.jstubbs@gentoo.org> <200512131115.43287.jstubbs@gentoo.org> X-Mailer: Sylpheed-Claws 2.0.0-rc1 (GTK+ 2.8.8; i686-pc-linux-gnu) Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary=Sig_lt8JuwBNWpTH5nPZ+vuk7Yi; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg=PGP-SHA1 X-Archives-Salt: 340aab46-42dd-4f6a-bcf4-e78449a52d42 X-Archives-Hash: 2856695d61c2f6a5ec44bdfc3f2ead54 --Sig_lt8JuwBNWpTH5nPZ+vuk7Yi Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Tue, 13 Dec 2005 11:15:43 +0900 Jason Stubbs wrote: | A GLEP should list whom has been solicited and provide evidence that | each has given their explicit approval of the GLEP. A GLEP without | explicit approval of all teams involved cannot receive managerial | approval. So... If, hypothetically speaking, someone were to write a GLEP saying "move developer documentation into the QA group, restructure said documentation to this new format etc etc", and the QA group were in favour, and the developer community in general were in favour, and the council were in favour, and the people proposed by the GLEP to manage the new documentation were in favour, but the existing owners of the developer documentation were not, you're saying that it shouldn't be approved? --=20 Ciaran McCreesh : Gentoo Developer (I can kill you with my brain) Mail : ciaranm at gentoo.org Web : http://dev.gentoo.org/~ciaranm --Sig_lt8JuwBNWpTH5nPZ+vuk7Yi Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc Content-Disposition: attachment; filename=signature.asc -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.2 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQFDnjDs96zL6DUtXhERAqQRAJ9q1TmNRTvWss7TmvSdoGVcykjmygCgxHVn XIH27/Uibaw3vXYGn1lOZW8= =p5in -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --Sig_lt8JuwBNWpTH5nPZ+vuk7Yi-- -- gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list