From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from lists.gentoo.org ([140.105.134.102] helo=robin.gentoo.org) by nuthatch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.54) id 1ElB2l-0005QK-7O for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Sat, 10 Dec 2005 20:10:07 +0000 Received: from robin.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.13.5/8.13.5) with SMTP id jBAK8ofE032107; Sat, 10 Dec 2005 20:08:50 GMT Received: from smtp.gentoo.org (smtp.gentoo.org [134.68.220.30]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.13.5/8.13.5) with ESMTP id jBAK5nag003105 for <gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org>; Sat, 10 Dec 2005 20:05:49 GMT Received: from 82-41-57-20.cable.ubr08.edin.blueyonder.co.uk ([82.41.57.20] helo=snowdrop.home) by smtp.gentoo.org with esmtpa (Exim 4.54) id 1ElAya-00058b-Ld for gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org; Sat, 10 Dec 2005 20:05:48 +0000 Received: from localhost.home ([127.0.0.1] helo=snowdrop.home) by snowdrop.home with esmtp (Exim 4.54) id 1ElAyV-0002BD-Km for gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org; Sat, 10 Dec 2005 20:05:43 +0000 Date: Sat, 10 Dec 2005 20:05:40 +0000 From: Ciaran McCreesh <ciaranm@gentoo.org> To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] December Council Meeting Message-ID: <20051210200540.068f2d53@snowdrop.home> In-Reply-To: <20051210194059.GE9505@toucan.gentoo.org> References: <20051207234959.GB14162@toucan.gentoo.org> <20051210180319.36cb7381@snowdrop.home> <46059ce10512101007g4ce4c33fxd1b006aca7c8a480@mail.gmail.com> <20051210182120.16e71d70@snowdrop.home> <20051210194059.GE9505@toucan.gentoo.org> X-Mailer: Sylpheed-Claws 2.0.0-rc1 (GTK+ 2.8.8; i686-pc-linux-gnu) Precedence: bulk List-Post: <mailto:gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org> List-Help: <mailto:gentoo-dev+help@gentoo.org> List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:gentoo-dev+unsubscribe@gentoo.org> List-Subscribe: <mailto:gentoo-dev+subscribe@gentoo.org> List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail <gentoo-dev.gentoo.org> X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary=Sig_qJr6JDMn3uu7nwDbNcxMcYR; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg=PGP-SHA1 X-Archives-Salt: a42f203d-f2f2-4b50-a8d0-3b9035682ca7 X-Archives-Hash: 3194c6efedd71692b5b4f62c8dd42030 --Sig_qJr6JDMn3uu7nwDbNcxMcYR Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Sat, 10 Dec 2005 19:40:59 +0000 Mike Frysinger <vapier@gentoo.org> wrote: | there's no point in bringing it back to the council in the current | form as we're just likely to approve it again So the council is aware of all the shortcomings and impossibilities with the GLEP in its current form, and would still approve it? --=20 Ciaran McCreesh : Gentoo Developer (I can kill you with my brain) Mail : ciaranm at gentoo.org Web : http://dev.gentoo.org/~ciaranm --Sig_qJr6JDMn3uu7nwDbNcxMcYR Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc Content-Disposition: attachment; filename=signature.asc -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.2 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQFDmzUX96zL6DUtXhERAvyCAKCHBDT4ClbdpyWXhlRR30t8kEh3KwCgiYJl 8MRQzBKgyt51wwALf63t8jQ= =E1M+ -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --Sig_qJr6JDMn3uu7nwDbNcxMcYR-- -- gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list