From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from lists.gentoo.org ([140.105.134.102] helo=robin.gentoo.org) by nuthatch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.54) id 1EjyeI-00067m-OT for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Wed, 07 Dec 2005 12:43:55 +0000 Received: from robin.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.13.5/8.13.5) with SMTP id jB7Cgc3F010293; Wed, 7 Dec 2005 12:42:38 GMT Received: from smtp.gentoo.org (smtp.gentoo.org [134.68.220.30]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.13.5/8.13.5) with ESMTP id jB7CdB95017623 for ; Wed, 7 Dec 2005 12:39:12 GMT Received: from jj039137.ppp.dion.ne.jp ([211.4.39.137] helo=opteron246.suzuki-stubbs.home) by smtp.gentoo.org with esmtpa (Exim 4.54) id 1EjyZj-0007kN-6K for gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org; Wed, 07 Dec 2005 12:39:11 +0000 Received: by opteron246.suzuki-stubbs.home (Postfix, from userid 1000) id A89F3201A18; Wed, 7 Dec 2005 21:39:16 +0900 (JST) From: Jason Stubbs To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Modular X porting: dependency changes Date: Wed, 7 Dec 2005 21:39:16 +0900 User-Agent: KMail/1.9 References: <43823315.4010604@gentoo.org> <438EB0C6.2000405@gentoo.org> <43969745.4050201@gentoo.org> In-Reply-To: <43969745.4050201@gentoo.org> Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-15" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200512072139.16592.jstubbs@gentoo.org> X-Archives-Salt: 2a3d2054-32a2-4ea2-86b1-49de23b0db34 X-Archives-Hash: 9cc20220042dfdde295eb5c7808e7484 On Wednesday 07 December 2005 17:03, Donnie Berkholz wrote: > Donnie Berkholz wrote: > | As far as progress on this issue, we're looking into adopting glep 37 > | and creating a virtual/x11 ebuild to address this. > > I've just committed virtual/x11 to the tree. See > https://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=112896 if you run into any > problems with it. > > It won't work properly with macos yet because they use a "fake" package, > so they'll have to hang on to virtual/x11 in the profiles. It should work if the listed package matches what the macos profiles have in package.provided... > I plan to remove the virtual/x11 definition from base/virtuals in a > couple of days, because this should provide a full (and non-broken) > replacement. This can be easily tested in advance by adding the following: # cat /etc/portage/profile/virtuals virtual/x11 -* -- Jason Stubbs -- gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list