From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Received: from lists.gentoo.org ([140.105.134.102] helo=robin.gentoo.org)
	by nuthatch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50)
	id 1EhaiV-0006vE-Hl
	for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Wed, 30 Nov 2005 22:46:23 +0000
Received: from robin.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by robin.gentoo.org (8.13.5/8.13.5) with SMTP id jAUMjGGc007534;
	Wed, 30 Nov 2005 22:45:16 GMT
Received: from smtp.gentoo.org (smtp.gentoo.org [134.68.220.30])
	by robin.gentoo.org (8.13.5/8.13.5) with ESMTP id jAUMgs3e007075
	for <gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org>; Wed, 30 Nov 2005 22:42:54 GMT
Received: from 82-41-57-20.cable.ubr08.edin.blueyonder.co.uk ([82.41.57.20] helo=snowdrop.home)
	by smtp.gentoo.org with esmtpa (Exim 4.43)
	id 1Ehaf8-0004Cm-5X
	for gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org; Wed, 30 Nov 2005 22:42:54 +0000
Received: from localhost.home ([127.0.0.1] helo=snowdrop.home)
	by snowdrop.home with esmtp (Exim 4.54)
	id 1Ehaf5-0004QK-D9
	for gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org; Wed, 30 Nov 2005 22:42:51 +0000
Date: Wed, 30 Nov 2005 22:42:48 +0000
From: Ciaran McCreesh <ciaranm@gentoo.org>
To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org
Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Moving GCC-3.4 to stable on x86
Message-ID: <20051130224248.5f48a268@snowdrop.home>
In-Reply-To: <20051130223456.GD6528@sympatico.ca>
References: <20051128142233.GA19195@aerie.halcy0n.com>
	<20051130185640.GA5891@aerie.halcy0n.com>
	<20051130200005.GA17628@superlupo.rechner>
	<438E068F.7020804@leetworks.com>
	<20051130223456.GD6528@sympatico.ca>
X-Mailer: Sylpheed-Claws 1.9.100 (GTK+ 2.6.10; i686-pc-linux-gnu)
Precedence: bulk
List-Post: <mailto:gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gentoo-dev+help@gentoo.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:gentoo-dev+unsubscribe@gentoo.org>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:gentoo-dev+subscribe@gentoo.org>
List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail <gentoo-dev.gentoo.org>
X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@gentoo.org
Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="Sig_wOy4vUxVpAq9wda+BUDnfg=";
 protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg=PGP-SHA1
X-Archives-Salt: c7f40a79-12a6-4c77-97ac-badc0503e727
X-Archives-Hash: b2d8ead61326962fb39f6ea00b895f36

--Sig_wOy4vUxVpAq9wda+BUDnfg=
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

On Wed, 30 Nov 2005 17:34:56 -0500 Philip Webb <purslow@sympatico.ca>
wrote:
| As one of the "masses", I am certainly disturbed at that implication.
| I don't remember any such need when I upgraded 2.9.5 -> 3.x (now
| 3.3.6).

The 2.x -> 3.x upgrade was far worse. Maybe you're just repressing the
memory of it...

--=20
Ciaran McCreesh : Gentoo Developer (I can kill you with my brain)
Mail            : ciaranm at gentoo.org
Web             : http://dev.gentoo.org/~ciaranm


--Sig_wOy4vUxVpAq9wda+BUDnfg=
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc
Content-Disposition: attachment; filename=signature.asc

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.2 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQFDjirr96zL6DUtXhERArd5AJ9UUzCLRU+8I8r8x5neNz05P4OZEgCgyUiU
8miGPAtT+yG6UAR2KNRgEl8=
=WJ9e
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--Sig_wOy4vUxVpAq9wda+BUDnfg=--
-- 
gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list