From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from lists.gentoo.org ([140.105.134.102] helo=robin.gentoo.org) by nuthatch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1EhaiV-0006vE-Hl for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Wed, 30 Nov 2005 22:46:23 +0000 Received: from robin.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.13.5/8.13.5) with SMTP id jAUMjGGc007534; Wed, 30 Nov 2005 22:45:16 GMT Received: from smtp.gentoo.org (smtp.gentoo.org [134.68.220.30]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.13.5/8.13.5) with ESMTP id jAUMgs3e007075 for <gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org>; Wed, 30 Nov 2005 22:42:54 GMT Received: from 82-41-57-20.cable.ubr08.edin.blueyonder.co.uk ([82.41.57.20] helo=snowdrop.home) by smtp.gentoo.org with esmtpa (Exim 4.43) id 1Ehaf8-0004Cm-5X for gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org; Wed, 30 Nov 2005 22:42:54 +0000 Received: from localhost.home ([127.0.0.1] helo=snowdrop.home) by snowdrop.home with esmtp (Exim 4.54) id 1Ehaf5-0004QK-D9 for gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org; Wed, 30 Nov 2005 22:42:51 +0000 Date: Wed, 30 Nov 2005 22:42:48 +0000 From: Ciaran McCreesh <ciaranm@gentoo.org> To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Moving GCC-3.4 to stable on x86 Message-ID: <20051130224248.5f48a268@snowdrop.home> In-Reply-To: <20051130223456.GD6528@sympatico.ca> References: <20051128142233.GA19195@aerie.halcy0n.com> <20051130185640.GA5891@aerie.halcy0n.com> <20051130200005.GA17628@superlupo.rechner> <438E068F.7020804@leetworks.com> <20051130223456.GD6528@sympatico.ca> X-Mailer: Sylpheed-Claws 1.9.100 (GTK+ 2.6.10; i686-pc-linux-gnu) Precedence: bulk List-Post: <mailto:gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org> List-Help: <mailto:gentoo-dev+help@gentoo.org> List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:gentoo-dev+unsubscribe@gentoo.org> List-Subscribe: <mailto:gentoo-dev+subscribe@gentoo.org> List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail <gentoo-dev.gentoo.org> X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="Sig_wOy4vUxVpAq9wda+BUDnfg="; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg=PGP-SHA1 X-Archives-Salt: c7f40a79-12a6-4c77-97ac-badc0503e727 X-Archives-Hash: b2d8ead61326962fb39f6ea00b895f36 --Sig_wOy4vUxVpAq9wda+BUDnfg= Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Wed, 30 Nov 2005 17:34:56 -0500 Philip Webb <purslow@sympatico.ca> wrote: | As one of the "masses", I am certainly disturbed at that implication. | I don't remember any such need when I upgraded 2.9.5 -> 3.x (now | 3.3.6). The 2.x -> 3.x upgrade was far worse. Maybe you're just repressing the memory of it... --=20 Ciaran McCreesh : Gentoo Developer (I can kill you with my brain) Mail : ciaranm at gentoo.org Web : http://dev.gentoo.org/~ciaranm --Sig_wOy4vUxVpAq9wda+BUDnfg= Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc Content-Disposition: attachment; filename=signature.asc -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.2 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQFDjirr96zL6DUtXhERArd5AJ9UUzCLRU+8I8r8x5neNz05P4OZEgCgyUiU 8miGPAtT+yG6UAR2KNRgEl8= =WJ9e -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --Sig_wOy4vUxVpAq9wda+BUDnfg=-- -- gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list