From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Received: from lists.gentoo.org ([140.105.134.102] helo=robin.gentoo.org)
	by nuthatch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50)
	id 1Eh81V-0002DQ-QO
	for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Tue, 29 Nov 2005 16:08:06 +0000
Received: from robin.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by robin.gentoo.org (8.13.5/8.13.5) with SMTP id jATG6WAK002165;
	Tue, 29 Nov 2005 16:06:32 GMT
Received: from smtp.gentoo.org (smtp.gentoo.org [134.68.220.30])
	by robin.gentoo.org (8.13.5/8.13.5) with ESMTP id jATG4F3A013784
	for <gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org>; Tue, 29 Nov 2005 16:04:15 GMT
Received: from vapier by smtp.gentoo.org with local (Exim 4.43)
	id 1Eh7xm-0003Dx-Ry
	for gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org; Tue, 29 Nov 2005 16:04:14 +0000
Date: Tue, 29 Nov 2005 16:04:14 +0000
From: Mike Frysinger <vapier@gentoo.org>
To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org
Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Moving GCC-3.4 to stable on x86
Message-ID: <20051129160414.GG20234@toucan.gentoo.org>
References: <20051128142233.GA19195@aerie.halcy0n.com> <20051129023054.GA1350@toucan.gentoo.org> <20051129024014.GA24230@aerie.halcy0n.com> <200511290951.38136.greg_g@gentoo.org> <1133275834.13876.23.camel@cgianelloni.nuvox.net> <20051129150343.GD20234@toucan.gentoo.org> <1133278935.13876.29.camel@cgianelloni.nuvox.net> <1133279532.13876.32.camel@cgianelloni.nuvox.net>
Precedence: bulk
List-Post: <mailto:gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gentoo-dev+help@gentoo.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:gentoo-dev+unsubscribe@gentoo.org>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:gentoo-dev+subscribe@gentoo.org>
List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail <gentoo-dev.gentoo.org>
X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@gentoo.org
Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <1133279532.13876.32.camel@cgianelloni.nuvox.net>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.8i
X-Archives-Salt: 088935c2-e65b-4073-95d7-62e02ce73344
X-Archives-Hash: e9bd47ba6b24ca46733446e3328acb17

On Tue, Nov 29, 2005 at 10:52:11AM -0500, Chris Gianelloni wrote:
>   broken /usr/lib32/openoffice/program/gconfbe1.uno.so (requires
> libORBit-2.so.0 libgconf-2.so.4)

binary packages should never be in /usr/

> Is /opt ignored?

yes, because our policy specifically says binary packages in /opt
-mike
-- 
gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list