From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from lists.gentoo.org ([140.105.134.102] helo=robin.gentoo.org) by nuthatch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1Eh1Jj-0006i9-QV for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Tue, 29 Nov 2005 08:58:28 +0000 Received: from robin.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.13.5/8.13.5) with SMTP id jAT8vh5w030023; Tue, 29 Nov 2005 08:57:43 GMT Received: from callisto.cs.kun.nl (callisto.cs.kun.nl [131.174.33.75]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.13.5/8.13.5) with ESMTP id jAT8u0eD013639 for ; Tue, 29 Nov 2005 08:56:01 GMT Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by callisto.cs.kun.nl (Postfix) with ESMTP id A96D52E8217 for ; Tue, 29 Nov 2005 09:56:40 +0100 (CET) From: Paul de Vrieze To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Moving GCC-3.4 to stable on x86 Date: Tue, 29 Nov 2005 09:56:30 +0100 User-Agent: KMail/1.8.92 References: <20051128142233.GA19195@aerie.halcy0n.com> <20051129023054.GA1350@toucan.gentoo.org> <20051129024014.GA24230@aerie.halcy0n.com> In-Reply-To: <20051129024014.GA24230@aerie.halcy0n.com> X-Face: #Lb+'V@sGJ;ptgo5}V"W+5OCoo{LZv;bh,s,`WKLi/J)ed1_$0;6X<=?utf-8?q?700LVV/=3BLqPhiDP=5E=0A=09=27f=5Dfnv?=@%6M8\'HR1t=aFx;ePfp{ZQoBe+e)JOQ8T5*(_;mHY+cltLGq<;@$Y,=?utf-8?q?O=5C=24=0A=09Tm=23G6M?=,g![Q62J{na*S9d;R[^8pc%u\aiLqU@`kJtYl"^6pxdW Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="nextPart103039090.J7WcZafTbB"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg=pgp-sha1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: <200511290956.39476.pauldv@gentoo.org> X-Archives-Salt: cbb4a55a-d199-4a18-893b-ed946608a93a X-Archives-Hash: 4659a1a26c64414a0d1229bf7cc8d592 --nextPart103039090.J7WcZafTbB Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline On Tuesday 29 November 2005 03:40, Mark Loeser wrote: > Mike Frysinger said: > > that means when people upgrade to gcc-3.4, gcc-3.3 will remain on > > their system until they remove it > > > > so if user fails to rebuild all their packages before unmerging > > gcc-3.3 they will be screwed, but OH WELL > > Yea. Even after they remove it though, libstdc++-v3 should be pulled > in after that. Only issue I really see is people that have libraries > compiled with 3.3 and 3.4 and don't know why stuff is broken. I don't > know how large of a problem that will be though. =46rom my own experience of updating quite some while ago, I remember that= =20 the libraries are sufficiently compatible such that not so many bugs=20 occur. Paul =2D-=20 Paul de Vrieze Gentoo Developer Mail: pauldv@gentoo.org Homepage: http://www.devrieze.net --nextPart103039090.J7WcZafTbB Content-Type: application/pgp-signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.2-ecc0.1.6 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQBDjBfHbKx5DBjWFdsRAscgAKCsWwT9bAgg2So+JERVLYe3yH4jJQCg0wsX gntn56id2yOjO/SQ+zXKkbg= =uqTi -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --nextPart103039090.J7WcZafTbB-- -- gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list