From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from lists.gentoo.org ([140.105.134.102] helo=robin.gentoo.org) by nuthatch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1EggmI-0005Lu-FH for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Mon, 28 Nov 2005 11:02:34 +0000 Received: from robin.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.13.5/8.13.5) with SMTP id jASB1pa2006198; Mon, 28 Nov 2005 11:01:51 GMT Received: from callisto.cs.kun.nl (callisto.cs.kun.nl [131.174.33.75]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.13.5/8.13.5) with ESMTP id jASAxp3Z026120 for ; Mon, 28 Nov 2005 10:59:51 GMT Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by callisto.cs.kun.nl (Postfix) with ESMTP id 007A52E8217 for ; Mon, 28 Nov 2005 12:00:30 +0100 (CET) From: Paul de Vrieze To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: Split ELF Debug (default or not?) Date: Mon, 28 Nov 2005 12:00:29 +0100 User-Agent: KMail/1.8.92 References: <1133027430.5317.307.camel@localhost> <1133110523.5317.483.camel@localhost> <1133125287.7388.4.camel@home.yosifov.net> In-Reply-To: <1133125287.7388.4.camel@home.yosifov.net> X-Face: #Lb+'V@sGJ;ptgo5}V"W+5OCoo{LZv;bh,s,`WKLi/J)ed1_$0;6X<=?utf-8?q?700LVV/=3BLqPhiDP=5E=0A=09=27f=5Dfnv?=@%6M8\'HR1t=aFx;ePfp{ZQoBe+e)JOQ8T5*(_;mHY+cltLGq<;@$Y,=?utf-8?q?O=5C=24=0A=09Tm=23G6M?=,g![Q62J{na*S9d;R[^8pc%u\aiLqU@`kJtYl"^6pxdW Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="nextPart1997769.pVooEhJOsn"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg=pgp-sha1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: <200511281200.30356.pauldv@gentoo.org> X-Archives-Salt: 715ab390-48b1-431b-ba2e-a6f9a411a743 X-Archives-Hash: d4560f6cd9fd4f05374f6af5310a1187 --nextPart1997769.pVooEhJOsn Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline On Sunday 27 November 2005 22:01, Ivan Yosifov wrote: > > What is this debugedit thing for us non-devs ? IMO portage should have > some way to keep the sources around for debugging, for the patch you > are proposing to be fully useful. It allows some hacks on the debug info. For example the debug info records= =20 the location where the source was when the executable was built.=20 Debugedit allows one to change this to some other location. As one=20 doesn't want to retain the source in /var/tmp, this is probably a good=20 idea. Besides that one can use debugedit to find out which files are=20 involved and put only those at the other location. Paul =2D-=20 Paul de Vrieze Gentoo Developer Mail: pauldv@gentoo.org Homepage: http://www.devrieze.net --nextPart1997769.pVooEhJOsn Content-Type: application/pgp-signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.2-ecc0.1.6 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQBDiuNObKx5DBjWFdsRAtUkAJ9BTLlaIvvDl4Ezyz9tsTKjLOO17wCgio/C knWBMzpWce7uFu9UKmvAxl8= =lLzL -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --nextPart1997769.pVooEhJOsn-- -- gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list