From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from lists.gentoo.org ([140.105.134.102] helo=robin.gentoo.org) by nuthatch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1EgXhv-00066k-2I for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Mon, 28 Nov 2005 01:21:27 +0000 Received: from robin.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.13.5/8.13.5) with SMTP id jAS1KieR017973; Mon, 28 Nov 2005 01:20:44 GMT Received: from tiger.gg3.net (m006052.ppp.asahi-net.or.jp [219.121.6.52]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.13.5/8.13.5) with ESMTP id jAS1Ivva031984 for ; Mon, 28 Nov 2005 01:18:58 GMT Received: (qmail 6983 invoked by uid 89); 28 Nov 2005 01:18:55 -0000 Received: from ols-dell.iic.hokudai.ac.jp (133.87.4.159) by 0 with SMTP; 28 Nov 2005 01:18:55 -0000 Received: (qmail 26865 invoked by uid 1000); 28 Nov 2005 01:18:54 -0000 Date: Mon, 28 Nov 2005 10:18:54 +0900 From: Georgi Georgiev To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Split ELF Debug (defult or not?) Message-ID: <20051128011854.GA23278@ols-dell.iic.hokudai.ac.jp> Mail-Followup-To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org References: <1133027430.5317.307.camel@localhost> <4388EB4F.6060508@gentoo.org> <200511271354.33574@enterprise.flameeyes.is-a-geek.org> Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="ZPt4rx8FFjLCG7dd" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <200511271354.33574@enterprise.flameeyes.is-a-geek.org> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.11 X-Archives-Salt: d4a8a157-042d-4681-b4ca-a6046318e4ad X-Archives-Hash: 23589d66f7b925a7278df33daebab0cf --ZPt4rx8FFjLCG7dd Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable maillog: 27/11/2005-13:54:33(+0100): Diego 'Flameeyes' Petten=F2 types > On Sunday 27 November 2005 00:10, Luca Barbato wrote: > > It's great! > > Make it a FEATURE default on for common profiles. > +1, and it would be better if the FEATURES, instead of removing the gener= ated=20 > files, would disable the building of them completely, mainly because "wor= k"=20 > systems with limited CPU, RAM and HDD space would probably prefer not hav= ing=20 > to create and store them :) Wouldn't that break binary packages? I.e., if a binary package is built on a system with FEATURES=3D-splitdebug and then merged on a system with FEATURES=3Dsplitdebug the debug info would be missing. --=20 \ Georgi Georgiev \ "What a wonder is USENET; such wholesale \ / chutz@gg3.net / production of conjecture from such a / \ http://www.gg3.net/ \ trifling investment in fact." ale-- Carl \ / ------------------- / S. Gutekunst / --ZPt4rx8FFjLCG7dd Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.2 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQFDilr+fXO2NUT1EmYRAu3DAJ9gwZDEuS78HKHo/ao5J4rawUJH9gCeO/6F 2hmGpAv7YHEe6vczGKv+EQ4= =Z/Ep -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --ZPt4rx8FFjLCG7dd-- -- gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list