From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from lists.gentoo.org ([140.105.134.102] helo=robin.gentoo.org) by nuthatch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1EgPov-0003sc-UX for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Sun, 27 Nov 2005 16:56:10 +0000 Received: from robin.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.13.5/8.13.5) with SMTP id jARGtEhu004906; Sun, 27 Nov 2005 16:55:14 GMT Received: from smtp.gentoo.org (smtp.gentoo.org [134.68.220.30]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.13.5/8.13.5) with ESMTP id jARGrNt8030719 for ; Sun, 27 Nov 2005 16:53:23 GMT Received: from vapier by smtp.gentoo.org with local (Exim 4.43) id 1EgPmE-0003QX-R3 for gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org; Sun, 27 Nov 2005 16:53:22 +0000 Date: Sun, 27 Nov 2005 16:53:22 +0000 From: Mike Frysinger To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Are there valid uses for repoman --ignore-other-arches? Message-ID: <20051127165322.GC3272@toucan.gentoo.org> References: <4389DA15.2000707@gentoo.org> Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <4389DA15.2000707@gentoo.org> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.8i X-Archives-Salt: bb239984-5c5a-4efa-8422-4509818a968f X-Archives-Hash: 767950693d03e54959bfb6266e456953 On Sun, Nov 27, 2005 at 06:08:53PM +0200, Petteri R??ty wrote: > --ignore-other-arches Instructs repoman to ignore arches that are not > relevent to the committing arch. REPORT/FIX issues you work around. > > Are there any valid uses for this switch or can it be deprecated? From a > QA point of view this seems like a very bad option. uhh yeah, like people who want to commit a fix unrelated to any arch breakage someone else may have caused arch breakage is for arch teams to worry over ... without the -I option, maintainers are basically fucked and unable to commit any fixes until the arch issue is resolved and in case i wasnt clear, i'd be very against removing this -mike -- gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list