From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from lists.gentoo.org ([140.105.134.102] helo=robin.gentoo.org) by nuthatch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1EfqVX-00035h-NU for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Sat, 26 Nov 2005 03:13:49 +0000 Received: from robin.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.13.5/8.13.5) with SMTP id jAQ3CpXs016057; Sat, 26 Nov 2005 03:12:51 GMT Received: from smtp.gentoo.org (smtp.gentoo.org [134.68.220.30]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.13.5/8.13.5) with ESMTP id jAQ39CgZ003257 for ; Sat, 26 Nov 2005 03:09:12 GMT Received: from zj031127.ppp.dion.ne.jp ([222.4.31.127] helo=opteron246.suzuki-stubbs.home) by smtp.gentoo.org with esmtpa (Exim 4.43) id 1EfqR5-0006LD-Ig for gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org; Sat, 26 Nov 2005 03:09:11 +0000 Received: by opteron246.suzuki-stubbs.home (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 187AB248D82; Sat, 26 Nov 2005 12:11:26 +0900 (JST) From: Jason Stubbs To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Multi hash support in portage - status Date: Sat, 26 Nov 2005 12:11:25 +0900 User-Agent: KMail/1.9 References: <20051124010432.33eecead@sven.genone.homeip.net> <20051126031231.3bb97f83@sven.genone.homeip.net> In-Reply-To: <20051126031231.3bb97f83@sven.genone.homeip.net> Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200511261211.25839.jstubbs@gentoo.org> X-Archives-Salt: 96d842ff-915e-4dc2-8e75-f97a60ccaf8d X-Archives-Hash: e09e748569222c52cb5a4e6146e6e18d On Saturday 26 November 2005 11:12, Marius Mauch wrote: > On Thu, 24 Nov 2005 01:04:32 +0100 > > Marius Mauch wrote: > > Would you rather have now the ability to create multi-hash digests and > > Manifests with the result of a short and mid-term larger portage tree > > (in the long term the format will be phased out hopefully) or rather > > wait for Manifest2 support (which will definitely include multi hash > > support)? > > Ok, so far two votes for now and one vote for later, unless this > changes significantly I'll ask the council to add the decision to the > agenda for its next meeting (sorry, just don't want to be the bad guy > here ;) /me adds a vote for later to even it up. -- Jason Stubbs -- gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list