From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from lists.gentoo.org ([140.105.134.102] helo=robin.gentoo.org) by nuthatch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1EfpaV-0003Fo-JG for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Sat, 26 Nov 2005 02:14:52 +0000 Received: from robin.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.13.5/8.13.5) with SMTP id jAQ2E9xZ018425; Sat, 26 Nov 2005 02:14:09 GMT Received: from moutng.kundenserver.de (moutng.kundenserver.de [212.227.126.188]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.13.5/8.13.5) with ESMTP id jAQ2CJDE010544 for ; Sat, 26 Nov 2005 02:12:19 GMT Received: from [82.82.179.249] (helo=sven.genone.homeip.net) by mrelayeu.kundenserver.de (node=mrelayeu6) with ESMTP (Nemesis), id 0ML29c-1EfpY21aaE-0002qo; Sat, 26 Nov 2005 03:12:18 +0100 Date: Sat, 26 Nov 2005 03:12:31 +0100 From: Marius Mauch To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Multi hash support in portage - status Message-ID: <20051126031231.3bb97f83@sven.genone.homeip.net> In-Reply-To: <20051124010432.33eecead@sven.genone.homeip.net> References: <20051124010432.33eecead@sven.genone.homeip.net> Organization: Gentoo X-Mailer: Sylpheed-Claws 1.9.100 (GTK+ 2.8.7; x86_64-pc-linux-gnu) Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary=Sig_okEQKrrRFGXdiXClD_1hzGW; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg=PGP-SHA1 X-Provags-ID: kundenserver.de abuse@kundenserver.de login:7e6c91d1b14dbccceb2f2166522fa0f6 X-Archives-Salt: 3a8fbd06-cddb-42c4-b4f5-9f04cc3edb96 X-Archives-Hash: deed37b2ebda161cdcbb2ee5317ad2a0 --Sig_okEQKrrRFGXdiXClD_1hzGW Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Thu, 24 Nov 2005 01:04:32 +0100 Marius Mauch wrote: > Would you rather have now the ability to create multi-hash digests and > Manifests with the result of a short and mid-term larger portage tree > (in the long term the format will be phased out hopefully) or rather > wait for Manifest2 support (which will definitely include multi hash > support)? Ok, so far two votes for now and one vote for later, unless this changes significantly I'll ask the council to add the decision to the agenda for its next meeting (sorry, just don't want to be the bad guy here ;) Marius --=20 Public Key at http://www.genone.de/info/gpg-key.pub In the beginning, there was nothing. And God said, 'Let there be Light.' And there was still nothing, but you could see a bit better. --Sig_okEQKrrRFGXdiXClD_1hzGW Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc Content-Disposition: attachment; filename=signature.asc -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.2 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQFDh8STWzrL1pM7SNcRAuJKAJ9RzJ1JDYN65PR7hCsjOs75+QgtpQCeLu2n JUpbDpmHnx04KEf61obLC1Y= =mjrn -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --Sig_okEQKrrRFGXdiXClD_1hzGW-- -- gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list