From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from lists.gentoo.org ([140.105.134.102] helo=robin.gentoo.org) by nuthatch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1Efm55-0004X7-Th for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Fri, 25 Nov 2005 22:30:12 +0000 Received: from robin.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.13.5/8.13.5) with SMTP id jAPMTRuf019558; Fri, 25 Nov 2005 22:29:29 GMT Received: from server8324611272.serverpool.info (unimatrix-01.org [83.246.112.72]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.13.5/8.13.5) with SMTP id jAPMRWFs002992 for ; Fri, 25 Nov 2005 22:27:32 GMT Received: (qmail 14414 invoked from network); 25 Nov 2005 22:27:30 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO pluto.atHome) (kabel@cat0.de@cat0.de@127.0.0.1) by localhost with SMTP; 25 Nov 2005 22:27:30 -0000 Received: by pluto.atHome (sSMTP sendmail emulation); Fri, 25 Nov 2005 23:27:31 +0100 Date: Fri, 25 Nov 2005 23:27:31 +0100 From: Matti Bickel To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Update of http://wwwredesign.gentoo.org Message-ID: <20051125222731.GA5998@pluto.atHome> References: <1132921063.20680.18.camel@localhost> <438731CD.3070506@gentoo.org> <20051125213156.GA7035@kruemel> Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="IJpNTDwzlM2Ie8A6" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20051125213156.GA7035@kruemel> User-Agent: mutt-ng/devel (Linux) X-Archives-Salt: 69f9a3f5-603e-40df-8df6-0d1bf668b279 X-Archives-Hash: b3f04c6475fbc0982f1c61405bda7d41 --IJpNTDwzlM2Ie8A6 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-15 Content-Disposition: attachment Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Ingo Bormuth wrote: > On 2005-11-25 15:46, kang wrote: > >=20 > > This whole thing give me some idea. Now, it changes the design a bit an= d=20 > > probably no one will listen, but, what if thoses purple boxes where to= =20 > > be replaced by the bottom link stuff ;) > > The bottom links which are hard to see or notice (cause they're at the= =20 > > bottom obviously) and never scales with the page size, could replace=20 > > thoses boxes which are nice design-wise but useless content-wise.=20 > > (and just "a bit usefull" marketing wise, but is that really so importa= nt) > >=20 >=20 > You name it !!! The purple bar is useless, navigation should go to the to= p. >=20 > Want an impression, see: http://public.efil.de/gentoo-www.png I second that. Scrap the (oversized) purple bar und make it plain text. Get the user navigation up front and not cluttered all over the page. Personally i'd like the navigation to go to the left, but if that's too complicated i certainly won't suggest putting it at the bottom. I'd never look for navigation items below content. Just my 0,02 cent. Cheers, Matti --=20 Good evening, gentlemen. I am a HAL 9000 computer. I became operational at the HAL plant in Urbana, Illinois, on January 11th, nineteen hundred ninety-five. My supervisor was Mr. Langley, and he taught me to sing a song. If you would like, I could sing it for you. --IJpNTDwzlM2Ie8A6 Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.2 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQFDh4/TfNMcoUhJ7GwRAsy2AJ9AurMHa08fy9tGxiXMQHpLqoE1DwCfVG9r KEBc9qOK7GsTIqhsT5xdJMU= =fvAt -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --IJpNTDwzlM2Ie8A6-- -- gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list