From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from lists.gentoo.org ([140.105.134.102] helo=robin.gentoo.org) by nuthatch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1EffC7-0007Y8-SU for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Fri, 25 Nov 2005 15:09:00 +0000 Received: from robin.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.13.5/8.13.5) with SMTP id jAPF8Hdl014638; Fri, 25 Nov 2005 15:08:17 GMT Received: from smtp.gentoo.org (smtp.gentoo.org [134.68.220.30]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.13.5/8.13.5) with ESMTP id jAPF5eou011382 for ; Fri, 25 Nov 2005 15:05:40 GMT Received: from cp237988-a.mill1.nb.home.nl ([84.29.235.69] helo=localhost) by smtp.gentoo.org with esmtpa (Exim 4.43) id 1Eff8t-0007Pq-I4 for gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org; Fri, 25 Nov 2005 15:05:39 +0000 Date: Fri, 25 Nov 2005 16:06:07 +0100 From: Harald van =?utf-8?Q?D=C4=B3k?= To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Update of http://wwwredesign.gentoo.org Message-ID: <20051125150607.GA11507@gentoo.org> References: <438174BD.9060100@gentoo.org> <4381791C.8030005@gentoo.org> <43840EED.2010909@gentoo.org> <4387003D.9050800@gentoo.org> Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="opJtzjQTFsWo+cga" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <4387003D.9050800@gentoo.org> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.11 X-Archives-Salt: 8235b966-cf61-4e3c-9ffc-892d48334378 X-Archives-Hash: db9322ad242afae8d8bbfe2cdcce2fa3 --opJtzjQTFsWo+cga Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Fri, Nov 25, 2005 at 12:14:53PM +0000, kang wrote: > Curtis Napier wrote: >=20 > > gentoo.org and all domains owned by the Gentoo Foundation should > > render correctly in all browsers that are still in general use. IE5 on > > the mac is still a valid browser and will be supported as much as > > possible. > > > IE5 for mac contains unfixed security issues which won't be fixed (as > announced by MS), how is that considered supported ? Is it even still > distributed within MacOSX Tiger ? Even with its bugs, it's one of best browsers for MacOS 8.1, which I still use. But if you can suggest a better one, please do. --opJtzjQTFsWo+cga Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.2 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQFDhyhfwnQyISwouHwRAriRAJ9logQzUDmO1rohPnX9Q62ZuIKAVACfYR94 7rwgl+SumAxF502SN97D7Ko= =AcoH -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --opJtzjQTFsWo+cga-- -- gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list