From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from lists.gentoo.org ([140.105.134.102] helo=robin.gentoo.org) by nuthatch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1EfcmL-000022-Dr for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Fri, 25 Nov 2005 12:34:13 +0000 Received: from robin.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.13.5/8.13.5) with SMTP id jAPCWXLO025930; Fri, 25 Nov 2005 12:32:33 GMT Received: from hermes.orakel.ods.org (dsl67-66.fastxdsl.nl [62.251.66.67]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.13.5/8.13.5) with ESMTP id jAPCTTsn025413 for ; Fri, 25 Nov 2005 12:29:29 GMT Received: from aphrodite.orakel.ods.org ([172.17.2.15]) by hermes.orakel.ods.org with esmtp (Exim 4.54) id 1Efchd-0005Zn-4p for gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org; Fri, 25 Nov 2005 13:29:21 +0100 Received: by aphrodite.orakel.ods.org (Postfix, from userid 501) id D0E8F142B85; Fri, 25 Nov 2005 13:29:20 +0100 (CET) Date: Fri, 25 Nov 2005 13:29:20 +0100 From: Grobian To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Update of http://wwwredesign.gentoo.org Message-ID: <20051125122920.GA5886@gentoo.org> References: <438174BD.9060100@gentoo.org> <4381791C.8030005@gentoo.org> <43840EED.2010909@gentoo.org> <4387003D.9050800@gentoo.org> Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf8 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <4387003D.9050800@gentoo.org> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.11 (Darwin 8.3.0, VIM - Vi IMproved 6.2) Organization: Gentoo Foundation, Inc. X-Content-Scanned: by hermes.orakel.ods.org (Exim Exiscan) using SpamAssassin and ClamAV X-Archives-Salt: 7bdc4796-b659-4545-a6da-85a2f33828fc X-Archives-Hash: f38a1e0f0346778da1696570f0cc0bdb On 25-11-2005 12:14:53 +0000, kang wrote: > Curtis Napier wrote: > > > gentoo.org and all domains owned by the Gentoo Foundation should > > render correctly in all browsers that are still in general use. IE5 on > > the mac is still a valid browser and will be supported as much as > > possible. > > > IE5 for mac contains unfixed security issues which won't be fixed (as > announced by MS), how is that considered supported ? Is it even still > distributed within MacOSX Tiger ? IE5:mac is a dead end, IMHO. It isn't shipped with Tiger any more, and Safari has taken it's place. This already was the case for Panther as far as I know (but Panther does ship IE I think). Since Jaguar and before are really ancient I think it's not unreasonable to let IE5:mac have a very low priority in your renderings issue fixing list. IE5:mac has always had it's own quirks, but again, it's unsupported and not maintained anymore. Camino, Safari and Firefox cover its place quite well on the Mac. Talking about Camino (which is a native Cocoa/Aqua skin for Firefox more or less), the site looks fine, only the recent changes in the font affect it negatively to me. The fonts are small in the tabs-bar and shortcut menus (Documentation, Resources and Community). The text now looks vertically misaligned to me in the tabs-bar and footer, in comparison how it was before the font size change. I could live with it. Here are some screenies of the font-sizes: http://dev.gentoo.org/~grobian/Afbeelding%204.png http://dev.gentoo.org/~grobian/Afbeelding%206.png -- Fabian Groffen Gentoo for Mac OS X Project -- Interim Lead -- gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list