From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from lists.gentoo.org ([140.105.134.102] helo=robin.gentoo.org) by nuthatch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1EfD3P-00071u-Oh for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Thu, 24 Nov 2005 09:06:08 +0000 Received: from robin.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.13.5/8.13.5) with SMTP id jAO95NM8002848; Thu, 24 Nov 2005 09:05:23 GMT Received: from callisto.cs.kun.nl (callisto.cs.kun.nl [131.174.33.75]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.13.5/8.13.5) with ESMTP id jAO93Vu2028301 for ; Thu, 24 Nov 2005 09:03:31 GMT Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by callisto.cs.kun.nl (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8B6712E8216 for ; Thu, 24 Nov 2005 10:04:07 +0100 (CET) From: Paul de Vrieze To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Update of http://wwwredesign.gentoo.org Date: Thu, 24 Nov 2005 10:04:06 +0100 User-Agent: KMail/1.8.92 References: <438174BD.9060100@gentoo.org> <20051124052337.GA12059@gentoo.org> <20051124055050.GA4026@toucan.gentoo.org> In-Reply-To: <20051124055050.GA4026@toucan.gentoo.org> X-Face: #Lb+'V@sGJ;ptgo5}V"W+5OCoo{LZv;bh,s,`WKLi/J)ed1_$0;6X<=?utf-8?q?700LVV/=3BLqPhiDP=5E=0A=09=27f=5Dfnv?=@%6M8\'HR1t=aFx;ePfp{ZQoBe+e)JOQ8T5*(_;mHY+cltLGq<;@$Y,=?utf-8?q?O=5C=24=0A=09Tm=23G6M?=,g![Q62J{na*S9d;R[^8pc%u\aiLqU@`kJtYl"^6pxdW Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="nextPart4431903.ncN7OPHlG8"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg=pgp-sha1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: <200511241004.07049.pauldv@gentoo.org> X-Archives-Salt: f9e11647-3a4b-4116-93b8-e7fa7696b176 X-Archives-Hash: 85424a5da0d6a4da705e56c6015363e6 --nextPart4431903.ncN7OPHlG8 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline On Thursday 24 November 2005 06:50, Mike Frysinger wrote: > On Thu, Nov 24, 2005 at 06:23:37AM +0100, Sven Vermeulen wrote: > > On Wed, Nov 23, 2005 at 06:05:53PM +0000, Ciaran McCreesh wrote: > > > > Afaicr, the infinity sign will be kept, but I know a huge > > > > discussion will be held on this. It's not important in this stage > > > > of the development though... > > > > > > And now we're told that it *was* important at that stage and it's > > > too late to change things? Riiiiiiight. > > > > Like I said before, I rather like the infinity sign. The trustees > > have had a discussion on this part too. Their decision was that we > > need a "strong, compelling case for not using it since it is > > something the community has voted on". > > by 'voted on' you mean the vote that happened on the forums ? i > thought that vote was for the different website designs, they didnt > really cover aspects of different designs That's true. What I remember from the trustee decision making process was=20 that indeed the winning design was a guideline for what should be=20 implemented, not an absolute. That's why (at least) I wanted Aaron to=20 participate in the implementation. Paul =2D-=20 Paul de Vrieze Gentoo Developer Mail: pauldv@gentoo.org Homepage: http://www.devrieze.net --nextPart4431903.ncN7OPHlG8 Content-Type: application/pgp-signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.2-ecc0.1.6 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQBDhYIHbKx5DBjWFdsRAqEkAKCMf0G51x0fVmt0K2c/inVDPjHN6wCfWmEj QRgYT+jkABnkbj5fefgWiu8= =Y+BI -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --nextPart4431903.ncN7OPHlG8-- -- gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list