From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from lists.gentoo.org ([140.105.134.102] helo=robin.gentoo.org) by nuthatch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1Eez5c-00010Q-SX for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Wed, 23 Nov 2005 18:11:29 +0000 Received: from robin.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.13.5/8.13.5) with SMTP id jANIAEtR016216; Wed, 23 Nov 2005 18:10:14 GMT Received: from smtp.gentoo.org (smtp.gentoo.org [134.68.220.30]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.13.5/8.13.5) with ESMTP id jANI60Zc004720 for ; Wed, 23 Nov 2005 18:06:00 GMT Received: from 82-41-57-20.cable.ubr08.edin.blueyonder.co.uk ([82.41.57.20] helo=snowdrop.home) by smtp.gentoo.org with esmtpa (Exim 4.43) id 1Eez0J-0005nC-S1 for gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org; Wed, 23 Nov 2005 18:06:00 +0000 Received: from localhost.home ([127.0.0.1] helo=snowdrop.home) by snowdrop.home with esmtp (Exim 4.54) id 1Eez0G-0004DI-GU for gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org; Wed, 23 Nov 2005 18:05:56 +0000 Date: Wed, 23 Nov 2005 18:05:53 +0000 From: Ciaran McCreesh To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Update of http://wwwredesign.gentoo.org Message-ID: <20051123180553.51614e31@snowdrop.home> In-Reply-To: <20051123194947.GA6048@dmz.brixandersen.dk> References: <438174BD.9060100@gentoo.org> <4381791C.8030005@gentoo.org> <43840EED.2010909@gentoo.org> <20051123165711.0ff1df51@snowdrop.home> <20051123194947.GA6048@dmz.brixandersen.dk> X-Mailer: Sylpheed-Claws 1.9.100 (GTK+ 2.6.10; i686-pc-linux-gnu) Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary=Sig_ZoFTm_tKekU.dVohlEgPDKS; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg=PGP-SHA1 X-Archives-Salt: e865d035-9316-4d24-8f67-cf0f05b46d30 X-Archives-Hash: ab53c87ec169ec1110fd9e8643390d5d --Sig_ZoFTm_tKekU.dVohlEgPDKS Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Wed, 23 Nov 2005 20:49:47 +0100 Henrik Brix Andersen wrote: | On Wed, Nov 23, 2005 at 04:57:11PM +0000, Ciaran McCreesh wrote: | > I did bring this up a year ago. I brought it up before the close of | > voting too. Back then, it was claimed that the infinity was just a | > minor detail and not part of the design itself. |=20 | Yes, I remember that - I just can't locate it in the archives. It was on -core. But there was a nice forums post too. Sven Vermeulen writes at http://tinyurl.com/amyy3 : > Afaicr, the infinity sign will be kept, but I know a huge discussion > will be held on this. It's not important in this stage of the > development though... And now we're told that it *was* important at that stage and it's too late to change things? Riiiiiiight. --=20 Ciaran McCreesh : Gentoo Developer (Look! Shiny things!) Mail : ciaranm at gentoo.org Web : http://dev.gentoo.org/~ciaranm --Sig_ZoFTm_tKekU.dVohlEgPDKS Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc Content-Disposition: attachment; filename=signature.asc -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.1 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQFDhK+E96zL6DUtXhERAvPsAJ0Txwt7VJBa/4qJM7kt7DREHOH3PACdGJU8 cnZdAHva4c8pv4/RrbaLyPc= =HiNk -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --Sig_ZoFTm_tKekU.dVohlEgPDKS-- -- gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list